Template talk:UDThisMonth: Difference between revisions
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:It should be stylistically different and clearly marked as fiction. Other than that including it is fine. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev#Buildings_Update_Danger_Maps|maps 2.0?!]]</font></sup></small> 03:37, 29 June 2012 (BST) | :It should be stylistically different and clearly marked as fiction. Other than that including it is fine. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev#Buildings_Update_Danger_Maps|maps 2.0?!]]</font></sup></small> 03:37, 29 June 2012 (BST) | ||
:I'd suggest that it should be shorter. Right now, it takes up way too much space on the main page. Perhaps only include the fictional material on months that are light for content? {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 04:29, 23 July 2012 (BST) | :I'd suggest that it should be shorter. Right now, it takes up way too much space on the main page. Perhaps only include the fictional material on months that are light for content? {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 04:29, 23 July 2012 (BST) | ||
::That's because July is a popular month in UD history. July has by far the most notable events. Twice as many as August and thrice as many as Februrary. ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>05:27, 23 July 2012 (UTC)</sub> |
Revision as of 04:27, 23 July 2012
Proof of Concept
User:Bob_Moncrief/Timeline. I moved it to a template for Bob so I could start playing with it. All credit to User:Bob_Moncrief. ~ 21:16, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Content Discussion
So on Vapor's talk page some questions were raised about what content is & should be included in this template. To start with some clarification, information contained within comes from UDWiki:Project Timeline (which contains actual nonfictional information) and User:Bob Moncrief/Timeline (which contains fictional information from the Wiki about pre-2005 events). Because of the nature of much of the fictional information, which mostly mentions years without specific dates, the vast majority of information in this template is post-2005 nonfiction (I believe ~10 total entries are pre-2005).
That said, I would definitely like others to weigh in. Does fictional material have a place on the front page? If so, should it be cordoned off, or kept together with the rest (as now)? And if it should be clarified, how? Thanks! Bob Moncrief 01:14, 29 June 2012 (BST)
- It should be stylistically different and clearly marked as fiction. Other than that including it is fine. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 03:37, 29 June 2012 (BST)
- I'd suggest that it should be shorter. Right now, it takes up way too much space on the main page. Perhaps only include the fictional material on months that are light for content? —Aichon— 04:29, 23 July 2012 (BST)