User talk:Neutral objector: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== Nation Library danger report === | === Nation Library danger report === | ||
To Envious,by your own User page comment, this Envious account is a sock puppet in itself. I see new accounts created all the time, that update pages, and nobody gives them flak. I actually do not have another account as I lost that info years ago, but have been encouraged by the recent events of wiki abuse by certain parties, to take up and help keep the wiki a better place. Please do not comment on my page anymore. | |||
Also, you really need to get over your obsession, and zenophobia, of Jack... The Jack...whatever...whoever...because you're all over the place and it's creepy and kinda dumb. | |||
Goodbye. {{User:Neutral objector}} 04:24, 12 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
I just want to pipe in here to tell you what the rule actually are, seeing as Envious, despite trying to sound official, is mostly incorrect. An edit war is not considered vandalism, as long as the contentious edits in question aren't vandalism themselves. If an edit war occurs and escalates, the typical process involves a sysop protecting the page in question, and then the matter is dealt with between the two parties on [[A/A|Arbitration]]. It very, very rarely is brought to a ruling of vandalism. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/a}} 01:12, 12 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
::Fair enough. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/a}} 02:29, 12 May 2018 (UTC) | ::Fair enough. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/a}} 02:29, 12 May 2018 (UTC) | ||
One thing you should be warned about however, is, if you're going to change the Danger Report description, please sign the edit appropriately. Otherwise you are changing the wording of someone else's report, and attributing it to them, which is impersonation, and is vandalism. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/a}} 01:15, 12 May 2018 (UTC) | One thing you should be warned about however, is, if you're going to change the Danger Report description, please sign the edit appropriately. Otherwise you are changing the wording of someone else's report, and attributing it to them, which is impersonation, and is vandalism. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/a}} 01:15, 12 May 2018 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:24, 12 May 2018
Nation Library danger report
To Envious,by your own User page comment, this Envious account is a sock puppet in itself. I see new accounts created all the time, that update pages, and nobody gives them flak. I actually do not have another account as I lost that info years ago, but have been encouraged by the recent events of wiki abuse by certain parties, to take up and help keep the wiki a better place. Please do not comment on my page anymore. Also, you really need to get over your obsession, and zenophobia, of Jack... The Jack...whatever...whoever...because you're all over the place and it's creepy and kinda dumb. Goodbye. How can I be a sockpuppet if Im a real person, and don't like a hand up my butt?
Dont be made just because Im making more sense than you. Next time just follow my lead and we can all get there together correctly and accurately!
Neutral objector 04:24, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
I just want to pipe in here to tell you what the rule actually are, seeing as Envious, despite trying to sound official, is mostly incorrect. An edit war is not considered vandalism, as long as the contentious edits in question aren't vandalism themselves. If an edit war occurs and escalates, the typical process involves a sysop protecting the page in question, and then the matter is dealt with between the two parties on Arbitration. It very, very rarely is brought to a ruling of vandalism. A ZOMBIE ANT 01:12, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
One thing you should be warned about however, is, if you're going to change the Danger Report description, please sign the edit appropriately. Otherwise you are changing the wording of someone else's report, and attributing it to them, which is impersonation, and is vandalism. A ZOMBIE ANT 01:15, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
