Template talk:ViewFF

See CSS3Please.com for common cool css trix and their fellow browser equivalents --Bean 17:17, 10 June 2011 (BST)

Template:Firefox has a better image of the firefox logo, imho --hagnat 17:47, 10 June 2011 (BST)

And try to use some of the effect available in firefox in your template. Look how mine looks so awesome when u use chrome :D --hagnat 18:14, 10 June 2011 (BST)

Personally, I don't see the point in either template. Things that look better in Chrome look better in Safari too, since they share the same rendering engine, so it's silly to advertise one without the other. And for 99% of code, as long as the person coded it as they should have, with cross-platform compatibility in mind, the stuff will work just fine in Firefox and Opera too. IE is the one big exception, but everyone already knows that anyway, so we don't need to keep advertising that IE sucks.

And before anyone tells me, yes, I know there are some thing you can do in WebKit that you can't do in Firefox (I even use one on my userpage, since Firefox doesn't support programmatically generated gradients as inputs for alpha image masks), and vice versa. But for rounded corners, shadows, and most of the other neat tricks we use around here, they all do the job equally well, more or less. —Aichon— 20:35, 10 June 2011 (BST)

Let the record show that Internet Explorer 9 is a huge improvement and very compliant to CSS3 and HTML5 standards. Indeed, Webkit is avant-garde when it comes to integrating new CSS3 functionality, but other browsers follow. It's not true that there's no gradient property available for Firefox (3.6), it's background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #444444, #999999);. Bean 00:50, 12 June 2011 (BST)