User talk:Ludwig

General

• Neutral point of view or not, SomethingAwful is a website that makes me ashamed to be human, and the things that confirmed SA members have said just further that feeling. As far as I'm concerned, you could be a ban-happy tyrant and still be more in the right than them. -Wyndallin 09:09, 22 April 2006 (BST)

Questions

Ask me a question in a civil manner and I will probably try to answer it for you, 'else it shall be deleted. --Ludwig 01:57, 21 Oct 2005 (BST)

Since you never came up with a proper answer to my question, I will ask it again: "Why do you automatically assume that you don't deserve to be treated so?" (hint: there are ways to answer that question without validating its premise) Kid sinister 01:07, 5 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Because the way several people with a vendetta act around me requires me to assume it (unclear subject for this pronoun) won't happen much. After all, they are the ones who keep following me every where I go. --Ludwig 19:09, 6 Nov 2005 (GMT)

So you're saying that the actions of others force you into thinking the way you do? Kid sinister 07:16, 6 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Of course. Same for everyone. --Ludwig 19:09, 6 Nov 2005 (GMT)

I wouldn't say "everyone"... For instance, I don't give a fuck what you or anyone else does, I'm going to think you're a steaming pile of mungbutter regardless of your actions. I hate to be the one to tell you, but assuming superiority over others due to the way they act is the very definition of an egomaniac. Kid sinister 03:54, 7 Nov 2005 (GMT)

I see, so every opinion you have ever had about anyone was first gotten when you saw them; and (semicolon splice) nothing they have ever done has ever influenced that thought?

And by the way, my superiority of (try "over") you is implied by your actions. I don't need to assume anything. --Ludwig 04:57, 7 Nov 2005 (GMT)

...said the man who can't tab correctly. That's funny, I always thought my superior wouldn't make so many grammatical errors.

Actually, I try not to let appearances of others mar my opinion of them. Keep in mind my opinion of you and the fact that I've never seen you with my own eyes. By the by, would you please try explaining to me just how it's "implied" that you're better than me? I'll try really hard to understand it. Kid sinister 05:50, 7 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Mostly because you continue to waste your time thinking up new ways to annoy me. In fact, (and you can tell this to your SA friends) your act has become comical. It is so sad that you guys waste so much of your day on me that I laugh when I come to the forums now, and I guess I have you all to thank for that. Besides, I�m the only one in this whole debate that has not had to resort to such poor language. That my friend, is the ultimate sign of victory.

Oh, and I would like to know just how you got your opinion of me if you did not get it by my actions? Don't say it�s based on what people told you, because your thoughts would still be influenced by their actions.--Ludwig 23:12, 7 Nov 2005 (GMT)

I am not your friend.

My opinion of you is based on your words. Words are separate from actions. For example, if I were to say, "I crown you the prettiest princess of Atlantis," you still won't get that crown.

Actually, you have used poor language. I went back and bolded some of your examples of it if you don't mind. You may want to go and back up your argument first before you try to take the ideological highground. I am confused on one thing though. You said that from your viewpoint we're kneeslappin' hilarious, that we're sad individuals, and this immaculate victory exists in your head. How do you not think that you're a delusional egomaniac despite showing all of its signs? Kid sinister 00:27, 8 Nov 2005 (GMT)

By the fact that you have no idea what my point was. I'm not talking about being a grammar Nazi, I'm talking about being so immature to use phrases like "steaming pile of mungbutter". I'm sure if you base people merely on words, you must hate Katthew more than anyone on the face of this earth. Because you clearly have no idea what I mean, I'm done with this conversation. --Ludwig 02:51, 8 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Godwin's Law aside, I'm asking you these questions because the points that you're making are not readily apparent outside of your head. Yes, your grammar does factor into that. If people can't understand what you said, they will ask you to clarify it. Giving reasons like "I'm right and you're wrong" just makes one look like a jerk. As for the "mungbutter" line you're ruffled about, that is my own opinion, and I would like to think that you're not such a demanding egomaniac that you wish it to extend into my mind as well. The difference between Katthew and yourself is that Katthew's words were right and completely appropriate, whereas yours were only serving the ego that you won't admit to having. Kid sinister 03:19, 8 Nov 2005 (GMT)

If you take ionized particles and add that to a strong base what is the resulting solution acidity?--Axe-man 08:37, 12 Nov 2005 (GMT)

Dont worry Ludwig, I'll field this one. Well, it depends on the acidity of the Solution to begin with, and the nature of the ionized particles. When these two are found, the new acidity can be found throug the equation pH = -LOG [H+]--Myself 18:43, 6 Feb 2006 (GMT)

So what exactly is your beef with me? To give more info, got PKed ingame and the PKer mentioned "Ludwig". Dying is of course no big deal or setback in UD as you well know, but I figured I'd ask anyway. -- Amazing 18:14, 29 Dec 2005 (GMT)

Wait, who are you? --Ludwig 06:16, 1 Jan 2006 (GMT)

I... ... I've forgotten. Damn it. (In actuality, I've come to the conclusion someone's just trying to frame you and the CoL up for PKings. I'll see if I can deal with it myself.) -- Amazing 06:36, 1 Jan 2006 (GMT)

When is CoL going to be involve with the Third Seige of Caiger? Its coming... 343