Category talk:Recruitment: Difference between revisions
Misanthropy (talk | contribs) |
Johnny Bass (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Wipe their ads, and tell them to re-add them without the magic words. As you tell them, they're templates in all but name, and are a pretty blatant circumvention of the guidelines. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 10:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC) | :Wipe their ads, and tell them to re-add them without the magic words. As you tell them, they're templates in all but name, and are a pretty blatant circumvention of the guidelines. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 10:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Awwwwww. :( {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 22:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | ::Awwwwww. :( {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 22:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Pull 'em. --[[User:Johnny Bass|Papa Johnny]] 22:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Splitting up Recruitment== | ==Splitting up Recruitment== | ||
Revision as of 22:40, 7 January 2010
Help Desk
- Need help figuring out how to use / follow / get the most out of the new advert guidelines? Post here!
- Previous discussions? Look in the archives(2 3)!
- Try reading this guide for a quicker result!
Magic Words for timestamps
I just now noticed that a few groups were using the {{CURRENTMONTH}}, {{CURRENTDAY}}, and {{CURRENTTIME}} magic words in their templates so that they could circumvent having to update their timestamp. The rules for the page say no included templates, but the magic words are not technically templates, yet they still are handled like an inclusion and require processing by the server. Plus, they clearly circumvent the spirit of the guidelines by allowing the ads to be posted ad infinitum, even if the groups go bust. I was thinking it might be prudent to contact the groups and ask that they update by hand instead. Thoughts? —Aichon— 09:27, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Wipe their ads, and tell them to re-add them without the magic words. As you tell them, they're templates in all but name, and are a pretty blatant circumvention of the guidelines. Linkthewindow Talk 10:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Awwwwww. :(
22:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC) - Pull 'em. --Papa Johnny 22:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Awwwwww. :(
Splitting up Recruitment
At the moment, Recruitment is so big it's unwieldy. It takes close to twenty seconds to load on my 1.5mbs broadband, and it would be unfair to assume that everyone has this internet. Also, with groups spread across different letters of the alphabet, it's difficult to find a group for a particular type of character.
I'm proposing that we turn this page into a disambig for three new pages:
Rules, etc, will remain on the main Category:Recruitment page. A reminder will be on all of it's subpages to check the rules.
This should make load times a bit more reasonable and make it easier for new players to find a group. Also, thanks to SA for providing the motivation to write this post :D. Linkthewindow Talk 10:25, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- I like this idea. But I'd propose that death cult-type groups go in both Zombie Groups and PKer Groups. 13:57, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Letting them double up is effectively extra/unfair advertising. We need to set up the disambig pages so that it's clear which one each group should fall under. —Aichon— 22:41, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- It used to be like this! I didn't like it when it was changed to the current mess and definitely support changing it back :D --Karloth Vois ¯\(°_o)/¯ 15:50, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- Letting them double up is effectively extra/unfair advertising. We need to set up the disambig pages so that it's clear which one each group should fall under. —Aichon— 22:41, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
