|
|
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==Welcome!== | | == Malton Census Program == |
| Hello Founder7! I noticed your recent edits to [[MacMillan Library]], and I wanted to officially welcome you to UDWiki on behalf of [[Project Welcome]]! If you have any questions or need any help, don't hesitate to contact anyone on that page or message me directly at [[User talk:Bob Moncrief|my talk page]]. Have a great day! {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 00:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
|
| == MacMillan Library ==
| | I would like to work with people one a Census of Malton, we would set designated areas, and collect infor that would go towards Building and Suburb Statistics. If anyone would like to help, please contact me.--[[User:Founder7|Founder7]] ([[User talk:Founder7|talk]]) 21:11, 24 May 2015 (UTC) |
| | |
| Hi Founder7. You have now twice deleted some information from the page [[MacMillan Library]]. This information is a required part of any location page, namely the Barricade Policy information, the Stub marker, and the Categories. Please do not delete this information again. If you wish to argue for a change of official barricade policy, please leave a message at [[Talk:Randallbank Barricade Plan]]. Thanks! {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 23:05, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Signing comments ==
| |
| | |
| Hey Founder7, I have noticed that you haven't signed your post over at [[Developing Suggestions]]. This is required to see who exactly posted that at what time. To sign you post, either add <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> at the end of it, or simply hit the [[File:Sign.png]]-button above the input field (which inserts the 4 tildes). --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">█ </span>]]</span>''' 14:20, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Answered your questions ==
| |
| | |
| ...on [[User talk:Bob Moncrief#Hello|my talk page]]. If you have any others, don't hesitate to ask! {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 15:15, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| === Your question ===
| |
| Hi Founder7! When updating a building status, e.g. for [[Busfield Towers]], you should never have to edit that page itself. Instead, in the status box at the top of the page, click "update" - it'll bring you to a page looking [[User:DangerReport/Busfield Towers|like this one]]. On ''that'' page, click edit, and then fill in the information on the appropriate lines as described at [[Guides:Danger Reports Guide]]. Hope that helps! {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 00:53, 30 May 2013 (BST)
| |
| | |
| :Did not help at all but thanks anyways--[[User:Founder7|Founder7]] 22:01, 30 May 2013 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ::Could you explain your problem then? :) {{User:Peralta/Signature}} 22:02, 30 May 2013 (BST)
| |
| | |
| :::when editing the page were do I put the "Status=" to make the danger report--[[User:Founder7|Founder7]] 22:14, 30 May 2013 (BST)
| |
| | |
| ::::You click on "update" in the top right corner of a danger report, which will lead you to a page. On that page, you click on edit. There you'll see status=, comment= and user=. Adjust them (don't forget to sign next to user=), save the page and the wiki will adjust the danger report on the building's page itself ;) {{User:Peralta/Signature}} 22:28, 30 May 2013 (BST)
| |
| | |
| oh, I feel stupid now, Thank you Baraga!--[[User:Founder7|Founder7]] 22:39, 30 May 2013 (BST)
| |
| :I'm sorry, I guess I misinterpreted your original question. So glad someone could help you! {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 03:16, 31 May 2013 (BST)
| |
| ::What can I say Bob, sometimes, you need more than just an amateur ;) {{User:Peralta/Signature}} 08:14, 31 May 2013 (BST)
| |
| | |
| == Nice building status updates, but... ==
| |
| | |
| ... did you play zombie too much, so you can't tell the difference between dark and ruined?
| |
| Tell please, how did you check inside those pinatas?
| |
| Also, do you really believe a suburb that is perfectly caded and has almost all TRPs lit, while useless buildings are dark, is a ghost town?
| |
| Other than that, great work!
| |
| --[[User:Johncleese|Johncleese]] ([[User talk:Johncleese|talk]]) 23:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :Well, I'm quite a newbie as far as Wiki goes and I'm still uncomfortable with using it. I noticed you replied, but can't see it on the page. I guess it is because you posted below your comment line. Could be also my fault, sorry in that case.
| |
| | |
| :Never heard of the term "dark"?! Ok, this is a dark building: [[Dark]]. Yes, based on its color (when you are inside) it might look like a ruin, but you simply cannot enter a pinata, survivor or zombie. I also used the word dark in the previous post for "unlit" buildings, but they are not really "dark".
| |
| | |
| :Ghost town... that's a tricky question now, with so low number of players. Based on that, every suburb could be considered a ghost town. Some of them are, but some of them are also maintained by a few people. --[[User:Johncleese|Johncleese]] ([[User talk:Johncleese|talk]]) 18:43, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
| |
| <!--- Insert Sarcasm Sign Here ---!>
| |
| | |
| :Wow, I haven't used this talk in a while. I'm not sure if I know how to use it!(so please correct me if I've broken some sort of rule) Well, to Answer your questions:
| |
| I've played urban dead for well over 2 years and I have never heard of the term "dark", so I'm not sure. I'm not currently a zombie, and used free-running to get inside them. They are certainly Pinatas.
| |
| | |
| Yes, I do in fact believe that a ghost town is a ghost town when less than 2/3rds of the buildings are unpopulated. However, I recognize survivors tend to clump together, and this makes most suburbs technically ghost-towns. So, I took the amount of survivors I saw, and took the number of buildings in Dakerstown, and made an average. My conclusion came to 28%. I also recognize that players tend to move around, so that figure can only serve as an estimate. To prevent the classification of a Ghost Town, a suburb must have a percentage like the above over 33%. This means there would have to be an over 5% increase in the general population. Its pretty close, but not close enough.
| |
| | |
| I would like to create a project, a sort of Census of the total population of suburbs, and a collection of building stats. I ask your opinion on the matter.~~~~
| |
