Template talk:Goonsig

Can't wait to see how many pages this will break. <noinclude> tags, while preventing info from being transcluded does not keep that info from template call limits. ~ _{20:36, 1 May 2011 (UTC)}

Let's find out, shall we? --█████████████ 20:38, 1 May 2011 (BST)

“‘What is lack of reading comprehension,’ Alex?” █████████████ 20:42, 1 May 2011 (BST)

Whoa, coolsig broheim █████████████ 20:40, 1 May 2011 (BST)

Lookin' good, bro. --█████████████ 20:40, 1 May 2011 (BST)

Fantastic --█████████████ 20:41, 1 May 2011 (BST)

This new one is even hotter--█████████████ 20:52, 1 May 2011 (BST)

POSTING MY PANTY-WETTING APPROVAL OF THIS SIG --|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 21:00, 1 May 2011 (BST)

My word! --|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 21:02, 1 May 2011 (BST)

Aw shit |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 21:07, 1 May 2011 (BST)

I recommend a blue, blue, blue, blue: █████████████ --Akule ^{Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™} 21:47, 1 May 2011 (BST)

I see what you did there. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 04:04, 2 May 2011 (BST)

Please fucking tell me this works. ||||||||||||||| 10:58, 2 May 2011 (BST)

So what's the point

Same question I ask Revenant but addressed to the general Goon population since he doesn't want to take ownership in this. What's the point of gaming the system like this. Is there some problem with the sig policy? Retribution for warning a Goon about their sig? Or just outright trolling? According to WIKI LAW, signing with this thing is pretty much vandalism. So how should this be handled? Can we cut the BS and red tape and just stop using this as a sig? ~ _{22:57, 1 May 2011 (UTC)}

--|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 23:22, 1 May 2011 (BST)

--|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 23:25, 1 May 2011 (BST)

I dunno, pal, do you think all the WIKI LAWYERS are going to just roll over and allow their impenetrable old boy circlejerk fortress of bureaucracy to be toppled just like that? Fuck no. These admins... they're more rulebook than man now. --|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 09:07, 2 May 2011 (BST)

I'm just happy I got it to work--|||||||||||||||||||| 21:14, 3 May 2011 (BST)

Testing this beautiful new signature. --|||||||||||||||||| 18:18, 3 May 2011 (BST)

halp

Does this not display correctly for anybody else using Chrome? --عبد الريحم بن حسين بن عبد الرحمن العراقي المصري‎ 01:33, 3 May 2011 (BST)

The pasted version: | works, the actual code doesn't. At least not in webkit/chrome. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 02:25, 3 May 2011 (BST)

err, it won't linkify either way for some reason. The bigger block does. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 02:31, 3 May 2011 (BST)

I'm using Chrome right now (as well as Firefox) and it looks fine? ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 03:06, 3 May 2011 (BST)

It seems fine in Firefox but it looks like this for me in Chrome: http://i.imgur.com/XAs4J.png (Using Chrome 11.0.696.57 for Debian if that makes any difference) --عبد الريحم بن حسين بن عبد الرحمن العراقي المصري‎ 14:20, 3 May 2011 (BST)

(i make no apologies for using a terrible os) --عبد الريحم بن حسين بن عبد الرحمن العراقي المصري‎ 14:21, 3 May 2011 (BST)

If it does Windows 7 is definitely well below the standard. I get the same thing on the stock windows 7 pc I have running chrome. --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 15:28, 3 May 2011 (BST)

It displays fine for me in Chrome on my laptop, but I still have Vista on it. --Akule ^{Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™} 21:22, 3 May 2011 (BST)