UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/List of Arbitrators: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:There’s no policy about the activity level of arbitrators. Honestly, the list is virtually meaningless, since anyone can arbitrate any case, so long as the parties involved agree on the arbitrator. Inactive people occasionally get culled, as I recall, but there’s no way to display when they were last active, other than by checking their contributions manually, e.g. via the link on the left side of their user page. The only user activity list we formally maintain is the one for sysops, and that’s just so that we can boot them for inactivity, since there actually is a policy for that. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 05:47, 20 August 2018 (UTC) | :There’s no policy about the activity level of arbitrators. Honestly, the list is virtually meaningless, since anyone can arbitrate any case, so long as the parties involved agree on the arbitrator. Inactive people occasionally get culled, as I recall, but there’s no way to display when they were last active, other than by checking their contributions manually, e.g. via the link on the left side of their user page. The only user activity list we formally maintain is the one for sysops, and that’s just so that we can boot them for inactivity, since there actually is a policy for that. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 05:47, 20 August 2018 (UTC) | ||
:I used to cull the list as per 2 or 3 months of inactivity when it was more bloated. My memory thought that was written somewhere but it seems to have just been a generic length. I probably just made it up. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/tcs}} 08:10, 20 August 2018 (UTC) | :I used to cull the list as per 2 or 3 months of inactivity when it was more bloated. My memory thought that was written somewhere but it seems to have just been a generic length. I probably just made it up. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/tcs}} 08:10, 20 August 2018 (UTC) | ||
::Not made up in the end. It was written [[UDWiki:Job Queue|here]]. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/tcs}} 08:18, 20 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:18, 20 August 2018
What a sad list
Nobody's got shit that needs biased solvin' anymore. Whats this wiki coming to?--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS 
LOE ZHU | Яezzens 19:59, 17 August 2013 (BST)
Activity
Is there a policy or WIKI LAW about inactive or maybe we can have a display on when they were last active? --
LABIA on the INTERNET Dunell Hills Corpseman 
#24 - 
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| TMG 04:30, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- There’s no policy about the activity level of arbitrators. Honestly, the list is virtually meaningless, since anyone can arbitrate any case, so long as the parties involved agree on the arbitrator. Inactive people occasionally get culled, as I recall, but there’s no way to display when they were last active, other than by checking their contributions manually, e.g. via the link on the left side of their user page. The only user activity list we formally maintain is the one for sysops, and that’s just so that we can boot them for inactivity, since there actually is a policy for that. —Aichon— 05:47, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- I used to cull the list as per 2 or 3 months of inactivity when it was more bloated. My memory thought that was written somewhere but it seems to have just been a generic length. I probably just made it up. THE CENTRAL SCRUTINIZER 08:10, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- Not made up in the end. It was written here. THE CENTRAL SCRUTINIZER 08:18, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
