User talk:VI: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Here ya go.: new section) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I used your background to test some things. The main thing in that mass of code that might be most interesting to you is the ''background:rgba(red, gree, blue, opacity)'' code. It can allow you to make transparent backgrounds so your image backgrounds show through, without making your text see through like normal opacity does. I'm not sure if there is an easier way or not.{{User:Mazu/sig}} 04:50, 12 June 2011 (BST) | I used your background to test some things. The main thing in that mass of code that might be most interesting to you is the ''background:rgba(red, gree, blue, opacity)'' code. It can allow you to make transparent backgrounds so your image backgrounds show through, without making your text see through like normal opacity does. I'm not sure if there is an easier way or not.{{User:Mazu/sig}} 04:50, 12 June 2011 (BST) | ||
== Here ya go. == | |||
hoboken_43@yahoo.com (Did you want/need the old one, too? Because if it's the one I think it is, it had part of my real name in it, which I sort of prefer not to have publicly visible). --[[User:Jen|Jen]] 18:57, 6 September 2011 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 17:57, 6 September 2011
As recompense for the horrible harm visited upon the Surrealist's page by yourself, I demand that you declare your demands as declarations of demanding demands. Clear? --Karloth Vois ¯\(°_o)/¯ 16:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Might be of interest
http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/User:Mazu/Sandbox#Possible_transparent_background_idea.3F
I used your background to test some things. The main thing in that mass of code that might be most interesting to you is the background:rgba(red, gree, blue, opacity) code. It can allow you to make transparent backgrounds so your image backgrounds show through, without making your text see through like normal opacity does. I'm not sure if there is an easier way or not. 04:50, 12 June 2011 (BST)
Here ya go.
hoboken_43@yahoo.com (Did you want/need the old one, too? Because if it's the one I think it is, it had part of my real name in it, which I sort of prefer not to have publicly visible). --Jen 18:57, 6 September 2011 (BST)
