Suggestion talk:20081124 Flashlights

Linkthewindow's old vote

1. Dupe, and it's not the only one. You really should take stuff like this to Developing Suggestions. Linkthewindow  Talk  05:13, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
   • Not to say I don't value your opinion, but don't you think a flashlight suggestion from a year and a half before dark buildings were implemented is kind of covering different territory? As for the other one, it only affected attack rates, not searching and barricading, and there was no mechanic for battery life. It may be the same in spirit, but it's not a duplicate if you ask me. -D4rkness 05:26, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
     • First off, thanks for being polite. It's not often that you see that around here. Secondly, although my two are borderline, the poster below me has a much better dupe (oxymoron?) Linkthewindow  Talk  08:18, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

I moved my vote here as I changed my vote to Spam. Linkthewindow  Talk  09:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Spamination?

Shouldn't this have been closed to voting on account of the spam/dupe votes?--William Told 20:04, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

There's not nearly enough Spams to get it spaminated (couldn't even be sysop-spaminated as it is), and while there's three dupes, there are at least as many saying that it's not a dupe. Besides, this will go to Peer Rejected anyway in less than two days. --Midianian ^{Big Brother Diary Room: [500,07]} 00:42, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

What Midianian said. The spam votes need a 2/3 majority over all votes, not just keep votes. Even if we excluded kill and dupe votes, it still wouldn't have a majority. Linkthewindow  Talk  00:44, 7 December 2008 (UTC)