UDWiki:Administration/Protections/Archive/2011 07

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Requested Edits

Place pages requiring editing here.

Recent Actions

Off-site admin action policy

Scheduled. I had hoped an edit note when I moved it on A/PD would get attention, but apparently not. Also, don't forget to add the protection template, and someone might want to go through the last few cycled withdrawn or failed policies to add that template where it's missing. Aichon 09:20, 25 July 2011 (BST)

Done all of the above.--Yonnua Koponen Talk | Contribs 00:41, 28 July 2011 (BST)

Talk:Escape

so do think we can protect this page? so morons don't keep posting on it. as they are too stupid to read the notice at the top or sign the retarded post--User:Sexualharrison22:32, 24 July 2011 (bst)

Don't see why. I enjoy fools as much as the next person. --Rosslessness 22:39, 24 July 2011 (BST)
curse you ross. yeh I wrote before i remembered how easy it is to revert.--User:Sexualharrison23:17, 24 July 2011 (bst)
What Ross says. I also saw no need to undo that particular comment. -- Spiderzed 23:23, 24 July 2011 (BST)
Yeah he was just curious about something, never hurt anyone... sorta -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 01:24, 25 July 2011 (BST)

User talk:Spiderzed

semiprotected as an hour long remedy for recent spamming. --Rosslessness 23:16, 19 July 2011 (BST)

As page owner, I am perfectly happy with this move. -- Spiderzed 23:20, 19 July 2011 (BST)
Cheers. Seems to be covered under UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Semi-protection, but I can't remember ever using it before. --Rosslessness 23:23, 19 July 2011 (BST)
Have made it two days now. -- Spiderzed 11:29, 20 July 2011 (BST)

Made admin template for the cause if you're interested :D -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 02:49, 20 July 2011 (BST)

Vandalised Suburb Group Templates

Semi protection requested to curtail recent spamming before it starts. Thanks. A month should do it. --Rosslessness 20:41, 19 July 2011 (BST)

Yarp. ~Vsig.png 20:48, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Just re-did the header and the request as the large one was making an ugly contents page above. -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 02:36, 20 July 2011 (BST)