User talk:Amazing/Sig3
No, it would not be legal. Image is too large. Nice idea though. 
02:51, 6 June 2011 (BST)
- Ahhh. I know a work-around, though. >:) Worse comes to worse, I'll just throw it up as a template for people to use on their pages. Dunno what for, but hey. -- ™ & © Amazing, INC. All rights reserved. Replying constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service. 17:15, 6 June 2011 (BST)
- I was stalking recent changes page and I must say if you get it to work it is a very cool idea. 04:17, 7 June 2011 (BST)
- I was considering doing this at some point too when I saw A.Schwan's sig but realized it's probably just be generally annoying to most people. That being said it is nice to see something different that's not anywhere near as horrible as most people's sigs.--Karekmaps 2.0?! 09:22, 7 June 2011 (BST)
- I was stalking recent changes page and I must say if you get it to work it is a very cool idea. 04:17, 7 June 2011 (BST)
Testing
-- ™ & © Amazing, INC. All rights reserved. Replying constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service. 20:11, 6 June 2011 (BST)
I'm rusty. How would I inset ONLY the date of the edit? -- ™ & © Amazing, INC. All rights reserved. Replying constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service. 20:18, 6 June 2011 (BST)
20:21, 6 June 2011 (BST) - Found it. Sorry for the bunch of edits. Kind of in a hurry and flying through this between projects. -- ™ & © Amazing, INC. All rights reserved. Replying constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service. 20:21, 6 June 2011 (BST)
-- ™ & © Amazing, INC. All rights reserved. Replying constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service. 01:40, 7 June 2011 (BST)
- Uh oh, it doesn't indent. :D -- ™ & © Amazing, INC. All rights reserved. Replying constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service. 01:40, 7 June 2011 (BST)
hagnat i can has idenntion, and mudkipz (and my age old avatar, now) 03:47, 7 June 2011 (BST)
- GAH. WIKI CODE. :D Yes, yes... I was stupid for deciding not to use it in the first place. :) By the way, my work-around for the image being too large is to use ASCII imagery like my main user page. (The face.) That way it's text, not an image, and I think not subject to any sig image rulez. Maybe. For now. -- ™ & © Amazing, INC. All rights reserved. Replying constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service. 17:45, 7 June 2011 (BST)
- actually, you only forgot to use the display: inline-block thingy, which should make your template works fine as is.
btw, no wiki code here :D--hagnat 18:15, 7 June 2011 (BST)- Thanks for pointing that out. Head-slappingly dumb on my part. -- ™ & © Amazing, INC. All rights reserved. Replying constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service. 06:40, 11 June 2011 (BST)
- Unicode symbols would also work, if you up the font size. 14:52, 11 June 2011 (BST)
- Unicode symbols would also work, if you up the font size.
- Thanks for pointing that out. Head-slappingly dumb on my part. -- ™ & © Amazing, INC. All rights reserved. Replying constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service. 06:40, 11 June 2011 (BST)
- GAH. WIKI CODE. :D Yes, yes... I was stupid for deciding not to use it in the first place. :) By the way, my work-around for the image being too large is to use ASCII imagery like my main user page. (The face.) That way it's text, not an image, and I think not subject to any sig image rulez. Maybe. For now. -- ™ & © Amazing, INC. All rights reserved. Replying constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service. 17:45, 7 June 2011 (BST)
