User talk:Iscariot/WIP28

Zyckde

Hi Iscariot, i can't speak for all in the coalition, and i have not checked with my other group members, but they don't care much about the wiki. So, i'll do some suggestions. Here come my biased suggestions.

Picture Beneath the picture it still says "War Declaration", that is not correct in my opinion. We warned the NSU, twice, once over the radio, and on their talk page. We warned them in response to a claim they made on the 5th of February 2010. For twenty days the NSU had not set foot in Krinks, however, provoked by the warning, they called war, and opened hostilities.

Ideological? The "ideological" bit is quoted twice now, but that is a bit vague. We warned them not to come to Krinks because the are nazi's. That might be better than "ideological", since the WWSIS does not adhere to any specific, or clear defined ideology.

Propaganda It seems a bit unbalanced that the NSU now get to repeat, again, this "we only want to keep the plant safe" business, without our POV coming across, namely that plants can't be defended if there are groups inside who try to create divisions along etnic, gender, and other irrelevant lines. (maybe just take the whole bit out)

Alliance The alliance bit is good, might be added that the wider range of groups joined after cornhoolio started killing, mainly because of the blatant anti-Semitism. The various screenshots of this are here(scroll down). It might also be good to mention that the Suburban Brigades were formed in direct response to the attacks by cornhoolio.

Peace In the 'peace offer' bit it says something about 'driving off', however, the NSU has never been inside.

Resolution That speech thing is a bit long.

--zyckde 17:41, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Seriously, suggest rewrites of sections. I had to go through the abortions of text he had on there to try and craft some sort of neutrality. Things like the 'War Declaration' still need to be acknowledged to achieve a NPOV article. For the NSU it was considered a declaration, as much fun as it'd be to work out an article that suits just us, we have to acknowledge their point of view or we're no different to them and what they tried to do with their version.

Of course, the other option, which I hadn't considered until now is to meatpuppet it into deletion and get him banned when he tries to recreate it. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 10:23, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Do you want me to rewrite sections on the article page, and safe every different section once, so you can easily track changes?

I think he should be banned for anti-Semitism and racism. However, it seems a bit late for that now.

--zyckde 10:36, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

It might be easier to put new sections on the talk page for now, if we get to doing an awful lot of rewrites I'll set up a new page or two where we can swap and change things in real time with a baseline here. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 10:41, 24 March 2010 (UTC)