Talk:Uniform Barricading Policy/Plan Reviews: Difference between revisions
(→[[Shackleville]]: typo) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== [[Shackleville]] == | == [[Shackleville]] == | ||
A small word from a Shackleville resident. | A small word from a [[Shackleville]] resident. | ||
On the whole, there's not a lot of adherence to the Barricade plan, because | On the whole, there's not a lot of adherence to the Barricade plan, because daily life reveals its not very well thought out. | ||
The center of the suburb, consisting of the area containing pretty much all the [[TRP]]s ([[Swithun_General_Hospital_(Shackleville)|Swithun]], [[the Raymond Building|Raymond]] and [[Luckwell Plaza Police Dept|Luckwell]]) are kept at EHB++ by pretty much all groups in the area. [[Clarkson Lane Fire Station]] is the commonly accepted entry point, kept at VSB++, providing direct access to the NT, police station and [[Dempsey Lane Fire Station]], Swithun and [[Harkness Auto Repair]] are just one step further, giving all commonly needed resources safely with just one entry point. On a similar note, the [[Free Running]] corridor to [[Woodroffe Mall]] in the east is also kept at high barricade levels. | The center of the suburb, consisting of the area containing pretty much all the [[TRP]]s ([[Swithun_General_Hospital_(Shackleville)|Swithun]], [[the Raymond Building|Raymond]] and [[Luckwell Plaza Police Dept|Luckwell]]) are kept at EHB++ by pretty much all groups in the area. [[Clarkson Lane Fire Station]] is the commonly accepted entry point, kept at VSB++, providing direct access to the NT, police station and [[Dempsey Lane Fire Station]], Swithun and [[Harkness Auto Repair]] are just one step further, giving all commonly needed resources safely with just one entry point. On a similar note, the [[Free Running]] corridor to [[Woodroffe Mall]] in the east is also kept at high barricade levels. | ||
Revision as of 09:48, 16 October 2009
If you have comments about a plan review, please make them here.
Old review comments can be found in the archives. Thanks! --Gilant talk-DEM 19:58, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Danversbank
The 'provisional' unreviewed Danversbank plan has been in place and working for the last 2 years. I can't see Danversbank ever being UBP compliant given the split suburb, the NT access problem and the general lack of people willing to maintain a suburb so far from malls. 2+ years in the suburb have shown that the provisional plan works well. R33F3RM4N 18:38, 2 April 2009 (BST)
- The provisional plan will be the plan that gets reviewed then, since that is the one that has been used most frequently. As far as people being willing to maintain a suburb without malls, that is a neglible issue. There are plenty of suburbs without easy access to a mall that work to maintain UBP levels--it's all about coordination among locals, and sometimes that just means lowering barricades yourself and tagging buildings with appropriate levels (particularly VSBs). --Maverick Talk - OBR
404 09:41, 16 October 2009 (BST)
Shackleville
A small word from a Shackleville resident.
On the whole, there's not a lot of adherence to the Barricade plan, because daily life reveals its not very well thought out.
The center of the suburb, consisting of the area containing pretty much all the TRPs (Swithun, Raymond and Luckwell) are kept at EHB++ by pretty much all groups in the area. Clarkson Lane Fire Station is the commonly accepted entry point, kept at VSB++, providing direct access to the NT, police station and Dempsey Lane Fire Station, Swithun and Harkness Auto Repair are just one step further, giving all commonly needed resources safely with just one entry point. On a similar note, the Free Running corridor to Woodroffe Mall in the east is also kept at high barricade levels.
The reason for this is that Shackleville is relatively limited in resources (1 hospital, 1 NT), but on the outskirts of Greater Ridleybank, and thus home to frequent Zombie invasions. Low-level survivors would simply be better off traveling south to Kempsterbank, with its staggering six hospitals. --Grungni 08:57, 16 October 2009 (BST)
- Thank you for the input! I will keep that in mind as I get to the review of Shackleville (not quite there yet, as you can see from the map. If you get the chance, could you update the barricade plan for Shackleville to reflect what you already mentioned? If people are not following the barricade plan, that means that they have come to some kind of a consensus among themselves. Which is great, but the barricade plans (as posted on the UDWiki) are meant to reflect both ideal conditions as well as a plan agreed upon by locals, so that visitors to the suburb can follow local policy. --Maverick Talk - OBR 404 09:37, 16 October 2009 (BST)
