User talk:Bjornkarl: Difference between revisions
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Just so you know, you absolutely cannot change the mechanics of a suggestion once it goes to voting, otherwise it invalidates the entire suggestion and you have to start over with a new suggestion. Since the changes you made were small and no new votes had come in, I went ahead and simply reverted your changes (no harm, no foul, basically). Regarding the complaints people have about you not nailing down the specifics, they're well-founded, but there's nothing you can do about them after voting starts, aside from weathering it out or else starting over with a revised suggestion. Changing it during the proceeding is not an option. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 01:41, 12 January 2011 (UTC) | Just so you know, you absolutely cannot change the mechanics of a suggestion once it goes to voting, otherwise it invalidates the entire suggestion and you have to start over with a new suggestion. Since the changes you made were small and no new votes had come in, I went ahead and simply reverted your changes (no harm, no foul, basically). Regarding the complaints people have about you not nailing down the specifics, they're well-founded, but there's nothing you can do about them after voting starts, aside from weathering it out or else starting over with a revised suggestion. Changing it during the proceeding is not an option. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 01:41, 12 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
:On another note, I don't know why you would want to change the suggestion anyways. As of current, you have 83% Keep votes. I'd say you have a pretty good chance at getting this into Peer Reviewed, even if it's not with 100% keeps. Just so long as you have 65% or more keeps, you're fine. 50% keeps is fine too (which would be Undecided), but not as good as 65% keeps. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 02:06, 12 January 2011 (UTC) | :On another note, I don't know why you would want to change the suggestion anyways. As of current, you have 83% Keep votes. I'd say you have a pretty good chance at getting this into Peer Reviewed, even if it's not with 100% keeps. Just so long as you have 65% or more keeps, you're fine. 50% keeps is fine too (which would be Undecided), but not as good as 65% keeps. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 02:06, 12 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Thanks, point noted Achion. --[[User:Bjornkarl|Bjornkarl]] 00:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:06, 13 January 2011
Feel free to leave any comments!
Also, don't forget to sign the Visitor's Page if you have read my journal.
Recon Training
That was a cool and well-accepted suggestion, aren't you gonna make it officially? ~m T! 23:45, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, was on vacation. Back, will take care of that today. --Bjornkarl 21:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Just so you know, you absolutely cannot change the mechanics of a suggestion once it goes to voting, otherwise it invalidates the entire suggestion and you have to start over with a new suggestion. Since the changes you made were small and no new votes had come in, I went ahead and simply reverted your changes (no harm, no foul, basically). Regarding the complaints people have about you not nailing down the specifics, they're well-founded, but there's nothing you can do about them after voting starts, aside from weathering it out or else starting over with a revised suggestion. Changing it during the proceeding is not an option. —Aichon— 01:41, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
- On another note, I don't know why you would want to change the suggestion anyways. As of current, you have 83% Keep votes. I'd say you have a pretty good chance at getting this into Peer Reviewed, even if it's not with 100% keeps. Just so long as you have 65% or more keeps, you're fine. 50% keeps is fine too (which would be Undecided), but not as good as 65% keeps. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 02:06, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, point noted Achion. --Bjornkarl 00:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
