UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Update Reevaluation Procedure: Difference between revisions
MisterGame (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Specifically, extending the one week of discussion to two weeks, much like other promotion procedures like sysops bids and crat elections. Basically, I find one week to short at ...") |
MisterGame (talk | contribs) m (lolfail) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{quote|Current Policy|The reason for only one week for discussions is due to the high-profile nature of the sysops, and most users should be familiar with them}} | {{quote|Current Policy|The reason for only one week for discussions is due to the high-profile nature of the sysops, and most users should be familiar with them}} | ||
As listed [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Sysop Reevaluations|here]]. Sounds rather vague to me. Considering the high-profile nature, I'd say there is no reason to make it shorter. We're basically discussing the activity of a sysops for the past | As listed [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Sysop Reevaluations|here]]. Sounds rather vague to me. Considering the high-profile nature, I'd say there is no reason to make it shorter. We're basically discussing the activity of a sysops for the past eight months, surely this process could take a little longer? I think making it two weeks does no harm, and can easily lead to more input of more users. Seeing as the sysops position is a valuable one, more input can only benefit both the community and the re-evaluation candidate at hand, not to mention making it more easier for crats to make a well-rounded decision. | ||
Thoughts? (Talk page please) | Thoughts? (Talk page please) | ||
Revision as of 13:44, 26 June 2011
Specifically, extending the one week of discussion to two weeks, much like other promotion procedures like sysops bids and crat elections. Basically, I find one week to short at the moment, I don't think I'm alone in here.
According to the current policy:
| Current Policy said: |
| The reason for only one week for discussions is due to the high-profile nature of the sysops, and most users should be familiar with them |
As listed here. Sounds rather vague to me. Considering the high-profile nature, I'd say there is no reason to make it shorter. We're basically discussing the activity of a sysops for the past eight months, surely this process could take a little longer? I think making it two weeks does no harm, and can easily lead to more input of more users. Seeing as the sysops position is a valuable one, more input can only benefit both the community and the re-evaluation candidate at hand, not to mention making it more easier for crats to make a well-rounded decision.
Thoughts? (Talk page please)
(Also, if the are other concerns regarding the current RE policy let it be known)
-- 
Thadeous Oakley Talk 14:37, 26 June 2011 (BST)
