UDWiki talk:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2010 02: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: <noinclude> {{:UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/TalkHeader}} {{:UDWiki talk:Administration/Vandal Banning}} {{:UDWiki talk:Administration/Vandal Banning/Bots}} </noinclude> =[[UDWiki ...)
 
m (Protected "UDWiki talk:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2010 02": Scheduled, admin archives [edit=sysop:move=sysop])
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>
{{:UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/TalkHeader}}
{{:UDWiki talk:Administration/Vandal Banning}}
{{:UDWiki talk:Administration/Vandal Banning/Bots}}
</noinclude>
=[[UDWiki talk:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2010 02|February 2010]]=
=[[UDWiki talk:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2010 02|February 2010]]=
==User:WOOT==
:::This is '''vandalism''', but fuck gay calls, they rock. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 22:41, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
::::An attitude like that is exactly what's wrong with this. Who are you to decide that racial slurs are somehow worse than sexual ones? --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 22:51, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
:::::A sysop, dumbarse. And besides, I was only joking, how intelligent you must be to have not picked that up. And this is coming from the "YOU CAN'T EVEN CALL SOME A RETARD ARRRGHHHH" thin-skinned bitch from 2009. Shit! I said bitch! Likening them to Thad, how insulting to female dogs everywhere, A/VB me and cause an international incident aswell. And another thing: Keep it on the talk page. God I would ''kill'' to have had that arbies ruling go indefinitely... --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 23:19, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
::::::You're dumb. And a nig...OH SNAP! You miss the point. I don't think you can escalate someone based on slander, when there is no policy defining what vandal slander is. Oh and no, I'm allowed to post '''on-topic''' that relates to the case on the main page just like everyone else. If you have a problem with that, again go change the rules. --[[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]][[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''''Thadeous Oakley''''']][[Image:Umbrella-White.png|14px]]</span> 23:30, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
:::::::No, YOU are dumb. It's called a TOU, you fuckin dumarse. You really ''are'' wrong 95% of the time. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig3}} 23:59, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:16, 8 June 2010

February 2010

User:WOOT

This is vandalism, but fuck gay calls, they rock. -- 22:41, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
An attitude like that is exactly what's wrong with this. Who are you to decide that racial slurs are somehow worse than sexual ones? --Umbrella-White.pngThadeous OakleyUmbrella-White.png 22:51, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
A sysop, dumbarse. And besides, I was only joking, how intelligent you must be to have not picked that up. And this is coming from the "YOU CAN'T EVEN CALL SOME A RETARD ARRRGHHHH" thin-skinned bitch from 2009. Shit! I said bitch! Likening them to Thad, how insulting to female dogs everywhere, A/VB me and cause an international incident aswell. And another thing: Keep it on the talk page. God I would kill to have had that arbies ruling go indefinitely... -- 23:19, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
You're dumb. And a nig...OH SNAP! You miss the point. I don't think you can escalate someone based on slander, when there is no policy defining what vandal slander is. Oh and no, I'm allowed to post on-topic that relates to the case on the main page just like everyone else. If you have a problem with that, again go change the rules. --Umbrella-White.pngThadeous OakleyUmbrella-White.png 23:30, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
No, YOU are dumb. It's called a TOU, you fuckin dumarse. You really are wrong 95% of the time. -- 23:59, 21 February 2010 (UTC)