User talk:Bjornkarl: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Feel free to leave any comments! | Feel free to leave any comments! | ||
Also, don't forget to sign the Visitor's Page if you have read my journal. | Also, don't forget to sign the [[User:Bjornkarl/Visitor'sPage|Visitor's Page]] if you have read my journal. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
<!-- please do not edit above this --><br> | |||
== Recon Training == | |||
That was a cool and well-accepted suggestion, aren't you gonna make it officially? {{User:Monstah/Sig}} 23:45, 9 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
:Yeah, was on vacation. Back, will take care of that today. --[[User:Bjornkarl|Bjornkarl]] 21:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
Just so you know, you absolutely cannot change the mechanics of a suggestion once it goes to voting, otherwise it invalidates the entire suggestion and you have to start over with a new suggestion. Since the changes you made were small and no new votes had come in, I went ahead and simply reverted your changes (no harm, no foul, basically). Regarding the complaints people have about you not nailing down the specifics, they're well-founded, but there's nothing you can do about them after voting starts, aside from weathering it out or else starting over with a revised suggestion. Changing it during the proceeding is not an option. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 01:41, 12 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
:On another note, I don't know why you would want to change the suggestion anyways. As of current, you have 83% Keep votes. I'd say you have a pretty good chance at getting this into Peer Reviewed, even if it's not with 100% keeps. Just so long as you have 65% or more keeps, you're fine. 50% keeps is fine too (which would be Undecided), but not as good as 65% keeps. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 02:06, 12 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
:Thanks, point noted Achion. --[[User:Bjornkarl|Bjornkarl]] 00:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
==[[Suggestion:20110110 Recon Training]]== | |||
{{User:Axe Hack/PRv}} --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 01:40, 25 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
==[[Update]]== | |||
Looks like a template. Should probably be at [[Template:Update]] instead. You can put in a [[A/MR|move request]] if so <small>-- <span style="text-shadow: #bbb 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em">[[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 11:58 28 February 2011 (BST)</span></small> | |||
:It was always a template. I'm submitting to speedy deletions now. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig4}} 11:30, 1 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:30, 1 March 2011
Feel free to leave any comments!
Also, don't forget to sign the Visitor's Page if you have read my journal.
Recon Training
That was a cool and well-accepted suggestion, aren't you gonna make it officially? ~m T! 23:45, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, was on vacation. Back, will take care of that today. --Bjornkarl 21:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Just so you know, you absolutely cannot change the mechanics of a suggestion once it goes to voting, otherwise it invalidates the entire suggestion and you have to start over with a new suggestion. Since the changes you made were small and no new votes had come in, I went ahead and simply reverted your changes (no harm, no foul, basically). Regarding the complaints people have about you not nailing down the specifics, they're well-founded, but there's nothing you can do about them after voting starts, aside from weathering it out or else starting over with a revised suggestion. Changing it during the proceeding is not an option. —Aichon— 01:41, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
- On another note, I don't know why you would want to change the suggestion anyways. As of current, you have 83% Keep votes. I'd say you have a pretty good chance at getting this into Peer Reviewed, even if it's not with 100% keeps. Just so long as you have 65% or more keeps, you're fine. 50% keeps is fine too (which would be Undecided), but not as good as 65% keeps. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 02:06, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, point noted Achion. --Bjornkarl 00:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Suggestion:20110110 Recon Training
Your suggestion has completed voting, and has been cycled as Peer Reviewed. The wiki hopes to see more of your suggestions in the near future. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 01:40, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Update
Looks like a template. Should probably be at Template:Update instead. You can put in a move request if so -- boxy talk • teh rulz 11:58 28 February 2011 (BST)
- It was always a template. I'm submitting to speedy deletions now. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 11:30, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
