User talk:Bjornkarl: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Feel free to leave any comments!
Feel free to leave any comments!


Also, don't forget to sign the Visitor's Page if you have read my journal.
Also, don't forget to sign the [[User:Bjornkarl/Visitor'sPage|Visitor's Page]] if you have read my journal.
----
----
<!-- please do not edit above this --><br>
<!-- please do not edit above this --><br>
== Recon Training ==
That was a cool and well-accepted suggestion, aren't you gonna make it officially? {{User:Monstah/Sig}} 23:45, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
:Yeah, was on vacation. Back, will take care of that today. --[[User:Bjornkarl|Bjornkarl]] 21:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Just so you know, you absolutely cannot change the mechanics of a suggestion once it goes to voting, otherwise it invalidates the entire suggestion and you have to start over with a new suggestion. Since the changes you made were small and no new votes had come in, I went ahead and simply reverted your changes (no harm, no foul, basically). Regarding the complaints people have about you not nailing down the specifics, they're well-founded, but there's nothing you can do about them after voting starts, aside from weathering it out or else starting over with a revised suggestion. Changing it during the proceeding is not an option. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 01:41, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
:On another note, I don't know why you would want to change the suggestion anyways.  As of current, you have 83% Keep votes.  I'd say you have a pretty good chance at getting this into Peer Reviewed, even if it's not with 100% keeps.  Just so long as you have 65% or more keeps, you're fine.  50% keeps is fine too (which would be Undecided), but not as good as 65% keeps. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 02:06, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
:Thanks, point noted Achion. --[[User:Bjornkarl|Bjornkarl]] 00:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
==[[Suggestion:20110110 Recon Training]]==
{{User:Axe Hack/PRv}} --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 01:40, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
==[[Update]]==
Looks like a template. Should probably be at [[Template:Update]] instead. You can put in a [[A/MR|move request]] if so <small>-- <span style="text-shadow: #bbb 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em">[[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 11:58 28 February 2011 (BST)</span></small>
:It was always a template. I'm submitting to speedy deletions now. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig4}} 11:30, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:30, 1 March 2011

Feel free to leave any comments!

Also, don't forget to sign the Visitor's Page if you have read my journal.



Recon Training

That was a cool and well-accepted suggestion, aren't you gonna make it officially? ~m T! 23:45, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, was on vacation. Back, will take care of that today. --Bjornkarl 21:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Just so you know, you absolutely cannot change the mechanics of a suggestion once it goes to voting, otherwise it invalidates the entire suggestion and you have to start over with a new suggestion. Since the changes you made were small and no new votes had come in, I went ahead and simply reverted your changes (no harm, no foul, basically). Regarding the complaints people have about you not nailing down the specifics, they're well-founded, but there's nothing you can do about them after voting starts, aside from weathering it out or else starting over with a revised suggestion. Changing it during the proceeding is not an option. Aichon 01:41, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

On another note, I don't know why you would want to change the suggestion anyways. As of current, you have 83% Keep votes. I'd say you have a pretty good chance at getting this into Peer Reviewed, even if it's not with 100% keeps. Just so long as you have 65% or more keeps, you're fine. 50% keeps is fine too (which would be Undecided), but not as good as 65% keeps. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 02:06, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, point noted Achion. --Bjornkarl 00:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Suggestion:20110110 Recon Training

Your suggestion has completed voting, and has been cycled as Peer Reviewed. The wiki hopes to see more of your suggestions in the near future. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 01:40, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Update

Looks like a template. Should probably be at Template:Update instead. You can put in a move request if so -- boxy talkteh rulz 11:58 28 February 2011 (BST)

It was always a template. I'm submitting to speedy deletions now. -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 11:30, 1 March 2011 (UTC)