Talk:Urban Warfare Doctrine: Difference between revisions
(→Whoa) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
This tactic is a pretty good idea,but it IS dangerous but then again,most things are just as dangerous.The only other problem is that its probably gonna be harder to coordinate but,if it works who cares if its hard?I support this greatly.--[[User:Gamestriker4|Gamestriker4]] 21:34, 25 July 2008 (BST) | This tactic is a pretty good idea,but it IS dangerous but then again,most things are just as dangerous.The only other problem is that its probably gonna be harder to coordinate but,if it works who cares if its hard?I support this greatly.--[[User:Gamestriker4|Gamestriker4]] 21:34, 25 July 2008 (BST) | ||
:I am sincerely hoping more people do adopt this. Yes it is dangerous, yes it is harder to coordinate, but if done properly and thankfully the only elements that REALLY need coordination c/o past experiences employing organized strike teams are the strike teams and recon elements themselves. As long as regular revives are kept up in the besieged suburb at a rate close enough to keep the survivor population going often independent survivors will fight and hold important Resource Points and TRPs without any real prompting either way just as long as they are kept appraised of the overall situation.--{{User: Garviel Loken/Sig}}06:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | :I am sincerely hoping more people do adopt this. Yes it is dangerous, yes it is harder to coordinate, but if done properly and thankfully the only elements that REALLY need coordination c/o past experiences employing organized strike teams are the strike teams and recon elements themselves. As long as regular revives are kept up in the besieged suburb at a rate close enough to keep the survivor population going often independent survivors will fight and hold important Resource Points and TRPs without any real prompting either way just as long as they are kept appraised of the overall situation.--{{User: Garviel Loken/Sig}}06:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
== How Does This Tactic Apply To Forts? == | |||
Like the title says, how is this tactic applied to suburbs with Forts? Forts provide invaluable resources in the same way as malls, and are even more defensible with their single entry points. However, when the gatehouse is overbarricaded, no one can enter or leave. During a siege defenders in the fort will be effectively cut off from defenders outside the fort, thus rendering the plan of striking different buildings in the area rather difficult to employ. [[User:Historian|Historian]] | |||
Revision as of 04:03, 30 April 2009
Fellow Traveller?
Thank you for codifying a tactical approach that I've been advocating for a long time now! I have some tiny critiques, and some specific modifications and/or additions to the strategy as I advocate it... but overall I think along the same lines as you... Also, this kind of play has been advocated by many players: a version can be found in the Guerrilla Warfare in Grimch's guide, and as far I know this is pretty much the way the Know Nothings and the Urban Guerrillas play... Still... Kudos for putting this together!
Good luck with this! --WanYao 00:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Whoa
I found this completely by chance, and it's almost exactly like a tactics page i was going to write up...
I hope more people adopt this. I'm adding the template to my page--CorndogheroT-S-Z 22:37, 10 April 2008 (BST)
This tactic is a pretty good idea,but it IS dangerous but then again,most things are just as dangerous.The only other problem is that its probably gonna be harder to coordinate but,if it works who cares if its hard?I support this greatly.--Gamestriker4 21:34, 25 July 2008 (BST)
- I am sincerely hoping more people do adopt this. Yes it is dangerous, yes it is harder to coordinate, but if done properly and thankfully the only elements that REALLY need coordination c/o past experiences employing organized strike teams are the strike teams and recon elements themselves. As long as regular revives are kept up in the besieged suburb at a rate close enough to keep the survivor population going often independent survivors will fight and hold important Resource Points and TRPs without any real prompting either way just as long as they are kept appraised of the overall situation.--Garviel Loken
No Pity! No Remorse! No Fear! Talk06:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
How Does This Tactic Apply To Forts?
Like the title says, how is this tactic applied to suburbs with Forts? Forts provide invaluable resources in the same way as malls, and are even more defensible with their single entry points. However, when the gatehouse is overbarricaded, no one can enter or leave. During a siege defenders in the fort will be effectively cut off from defenders outside the fort, thus rendering the plan of striking different buildings in the area rather difficult to employ. Historian
