UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/VB FFO Commenting: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (talk goes on talk)
m (Change!)
Line 16: Line 16:
| '''Administration Notice'''
| '''Administration Notice'''
|-  
|-  
| style="padding:3px 9px" | If you are not a System Operator, the user who made the vandal report, the user being reported, or directly involved in the case, all discussion '''must''' use the [[UDWiki_talk:Administration/Vandal_Banning|talk page]] for further discussion. Free-for-all commenting can lead to a less respectful environment. Similarly, if one of the aforementioned "permitted" users finds themselves engaging in a longer discussion, the Administration strongly asks you to move the discussion to the talk page.
| style="padding:3px 9px" | If you are not a System Operator, the user who made the vandal report, the user being reported, or directly involved in the case, any and all discussion which doesn't cite '''absolutely essential''' info pertaining to the case and/or its rulings is to take place on the talk page. Free-for-all commenting can lead to a less respectful environment.
|-
|-
|}
|}




Why? To stop the crusades against it, for it, and to keep the cases neater. The talk is there for a reason, use it. The case should be kept clean for all but the barest minimum of arguments, so 'ops, case bringers, suspected vandals and the like should be using the talk too.--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 23:20, 17 July 2009 (BST)
<s>Why? To stop the crusades against it, for it, and to keep the cases neater. The talk is there for a reason, use it. The case should be kept clean for all but the barest minimum of arguments, so 'ops, case bringers, suspected vandals and the like should be using the talk too.--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 23:20, 17 July 2009 (BST)</s>
 
Edited the changes, discuss the new bits.--[[KyleStyle_For_Everything|<font face="Rage italic"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Mr. Angel,</span> ]][[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 21:15, 20 July 2009 (BST)

Revision as of 20:15, 20 July 2009

Simple change. We go from this:

Administration Notice
If you are not a System Operator, the user who made the vandal report, the user being reported, or directly involved in the case, the administration asks that you use the talk page for further discussion. Free-for-all commenting can lead to a less respectful environment.

To this:

Administration Notice
If you are not a System Operator, the user who made the vandal report, the user being reported, or directly involved in the case, any and all discussion which doesn't cite absolutely essential info pertaining to the case and/or its rulings is to take place on the talk page. Free-for-all commenting can lead to a less respectful environment.


Why? To stop the crusades against it, for it, and to keep the cases neater. The talk is there for a reason, use it. The case should be kept clean for all but the barest minimum of arguments, so 'ops, case bringers, suspected vandals and the like should be using the talk too.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 23:20, 17 July 2009 (BST)

Edited the changes, discuss the new bits.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 21:15, 20 July 2009 (BST)