User talk:Spiderzed: Difference between revisions
(→WTF?) |
(DHPD Officer 666 and Officer Alcoholic) |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
:Happened with both sides and there were experienced active users during CK's time that said they weren't historical too. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 23:11, 10 April 2011 (BST) | :Happened with both sides and there were experienced active users during CK's time that said they weren't historical too. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 23:11, 10 April 2011 (BST) | ||
::for the most part i don't mind that. they are entitled to their opinion. at least they were around and listed reasons why we shouldn't be historical. shadey shit and the policy should be changed.--<small> <span style="color: DarkMagenta">The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking </span><div style="display: inline-block; height: 14px; width: 18px; overflow: hidden; vertical-align: text-bottom;">[[User:Sexualharrison|<span style="position: absolute; display: block; font-size: 0px; height: 14px; width: 18px;"> </span>]][[Image:Boobs.sh.siggie.gif|18px]]</div> [[User talk:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">bitch</span>]] 00:48 12 April 2011 (UTC)</small> | ::for the most part i don't mind that. they are entitled to their opinion. at least they were around and listed reasons why we shouldn't be historical. shadey shit and the policy should be changed.--<small> <span style="color: DarkMagenta">The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking </span><div style="display: inline-block; height: 14px; width: 18px; overflow: hidden; vertical-align: text-bottom;">[[User:Sexualharrison|<span style="position: absolute; display: block; font-size: 0px; height: 14px; width: 18px;"> </span>]][[Image:Boobs.sh.siggie.gif|18px]]</div> [[User talk:Sexualharrison|<span style="color:Red">bitch</span>]] 00:48 12 April 2011 (UTC)</small> | ||
== DHPD Officer 666 and Officer Alcoholic == | |||
If I start removing any allegedly NPOV postings by these jokers am I going to cause a big fuss or will people just be glad to see them gone? We don't like having them up there, it gives too much jam to the goons but were being cautious about messing with them too much for fear of causing some big flame war. However, it looks like the goons are going to take issue anyway, in which case we might as well remove them. Sorry to trouble you, I wasn't sure where the correct place to ask would be. {{User:Louise/PCatSig}} 09:35, 15 April 2011 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 08:35, 15 April 2011
THIS!
enjoy! -- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking
bitch 18:15 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Template
If I was a template image, how many kb should I be? --Kirsty cotton 17:42, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- There are no real rules on that, and it depends also on the size of the template. However, it should be as little as possible if the template is meant to be used in bulk with others (as with userspace flagboxes). Just upload it, I can always look if I can trim it some more in Gimp for you. -- Spiderzed▋ 17:48, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Should it go in the main space or my user space? --Kirsty cotton 17:49, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Just upload it. I'll find a place in my userspace to ark it until you can put it to use. -- Spiderzed▋ 17:52, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Don't worry about that, it's going to be on your userpage. Once I figure out how to make a template. --Kirsty cotton 17:56, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Mah userpage? D: 8kb works perfectly fine: If you need help making a template, let me know. Given the wideness of 130px, you are probably best off with either a userbox (250px) or a largebox (350px). -- Spiderzed▋ 18:04, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- I think it is something Salwy needs and some jerk locked her page from editing. I would link you but you'll find it anyways. :P --Kirsty cotton 18:06, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Someone locked Salwy's page? Poppycocks! If I ever find out who that was... -- Spiderzed▋ 18:18, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- It would be good faith edit to go ahead and add the template to Katie Burns userpage, right? --Kirsty cotton 18:20, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Better put the template on her talk page and ask her about it. We had recently enough retarded A/VB cases. -- Spiderzed▋ 18:21, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Something stupid happen on the wiki? NEVAR!!!!! --Kirsty cotton 18:25, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Better put the template on her talk page and ask her about it. We had recently enough retarded A/VB cases. -- Spiderzed▋ 18:21, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- It would be good faith edit to go ahead and add the template to Katie Burns userpage, right? --Kirsty cotton 18:20, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Someone locked Salwy's page? Poppycocks! If I ever find out who that was... -- Spiderzed▋ 18:18, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- I think it is something Salwy needs and some jerk locked her page from editing. I would link you but you'll find it anyways. :P --Kirsty cotton 18:06, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Mah userpage? D: 8kb works perfectly fine:
- Don't worry about that, it's going to be on your userpage. Once I figure out how to make a template. --Kirsty cotton 17:56, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Just upload it. I'll find a place in my userspace to ark it until you can put it to use. -- Spiderzed▋ 17:52, 4 April 2011 (BST)
- Should it go in the main space or my user space? --Kirsty cotton 17:49, 4 April 2011 (BST)
Pwnies in IRC
They are there wondering about Salwy. --Kirsty cotton 00:31, 7 April 2011 (BST)
- They are very keen that Salwy brings a saddle if she's coming out to play. Because, you know, eww. User:Domino Harvey 00:32, 7 April 2011 (BST)
- Does this relate to Salwy's lack of panties? --Kirsty cotton 00:44, 7 April 2011 (BST)
WTF?
who are these people?.. there needs to be a rule in historical voting. that if you started playing during the three or four mouths of inactively you should not vote on a historical vote if you had nothing to do with it. i mean had these players been around when CK was active it would be a different story.. a few of these votes seem like "hey i don't like this group sign up for the wiki and meatpuppet it with me votes" TBH.
we waz robbed!-- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking
bitch 19:50 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- Happened with both sides and there were experienced active users during CK's time that said they weren't historical too. --Karekmaps?! 23:11, 10 April 2011 (BST)
- for the most part i don't mind that. they are entitled to their opinion. at least they were around and listed reasons why we shouldn't be historical. shadey shit and the policy should be changed.-- The preceding signed comment was added by these amazing looking bitch 00:48 12 April 2011 (UTC)
DHPD Officer 666 and Officer Alcoholic
If I start removing any allegedly NPOV postings by these jokers am I going to cause a big fuss or will people just be glad to see them gone? We don't like having them up there, it gives too much jam to the goons but were being cautious about messing with them too much for fear of causing some big flame war. However, it looks like the goons are going to take issue anyway, in which case we might as well remove them. Sorry to trouble you, I wasn't sure where the correct place to ask would be. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 09:35, 15 April 2011 (BST)
