UDWiki talk:Administration/Policy Discussion/Update Reevaluation Procedure: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
Rosslessness (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Whaterver --<small>[[User:Hagnat|hagnat]]</small> 20:32, 26 June 2011 (BST) | Whaterver --<small>[[User:Hagnat|hagnat]]</small> 20:32, 26 June 2011 (BST) | ||
==Unnecessary== | |||
Reviewing all re-evaluation requests it seems the silver bullet for denying re-evaluations is a lack of activity. In such circumstances the shorter time is beneficial as it is a good acid test of whether the sop is editing or even aware of the process, and sometimes promotes a surge in activity. (The kick up the back side approach). --[[User:Rosslessness|Rosslessness]] 22:57, 26 June 2011 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 21:57, 26 June 2011
For it
I see no need for complicating matters when can just keep the same discussion duration for both A/PM and A/RE. Besides, the one week more sys-ops would have by that policy would be meaningless compared to the 8 months of their usual term. Keep it simple, stupid. -- Spiderzed█ 14:40, 26 June 2011 (BST)
Meh.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 14:42, 26 June 2011 (BST)
Whaterver --hagnat 20:32, 26 June 2011 (BST)
Unnecessary
Reviewing all re-evaluation requests it seems the silver bullet for denying re-evaluations is a lack of activity. In such circumstances the shorter time is beneficial as it is a good acid test of whether the sop is editing or even aware of the process, and sometimes promotes a surge in activity. (The kick up the back side approach). --Rosslessness 22:57, 26 June 2011 (BST)
