User talk:Spiderzed: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
:::::<!--<big><big><big><big><big><big><big><big>-->DILDO!<!--</big></big></big></big></big></big></big></big>-->--{{User:Sexualharrison/sig}}<small>04:57, 2 April 2013 </small>
:::::<!--<big><big><big><big><big><big><big><big>-->DILDO!<!--</big></big></big></big></big></big></big></big>-->--{{User:Sexualharrison/sig}}<small>04:57, 2 April 2013 </small>
::Time's up now, and no new counter-arguments have come up. I'd say Bob's promotion is due. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">█ </span>]]</span>''' 17:14, 2 April 2013 (BST)
::Time's up now, and no new counter-arguments have come up. I'd say Bob's promotion is due. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">█ </span>]]</span>''' 17:14, 2 April 2013 (BST)
:::I agree. I'll let you process it since I was the one that put it forward. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 20:29, 2 April 2013 (BST)

Revision as of 19:29, 2 April 2013

LIST SZTALK.TXT
2010 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2011 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2012 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Bob

Since it's a holiday weekend, I figured I'd start the discussion a bit early. Clearly I'm in favor of a promotion, and it would seem the community is as well, I believe. Aichon 15:24, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

  • DDR has raised concerns about Bob being another Shortround to happen. I have checkusered around, but found nothing that could suggest such a thing.
  • Kirsty has raised the concern that Bob should be protected from himself, but this isn't really our job as crats.
  • Also, Bob has made a minor mistake when he failed to archive his A/DE policy. This one is the strongest counter-argument I can come up with, and I am the devil's advocate in this one.
Bob had very good answers for my hypothetical Cornholioo Permaban Appeal scenario, which contained both a lot of wikilaw technicalities and situations without a clear One True Answer. He had caught all of the former, and had good reasoning for the latter.
tl;dr: Short of someone bursting dramatically through the window right at the minute that my finger crawls towards the Promote button, shouting "STOP! HEAR ME! HEAR ME!" and then providing Shocking New Evidence™ that Bob is actually Cornholioo, we should have another sys-op next week. -- Spiderzed 16:00, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Dramatic change of circumstances. See A/DM. -- Spiderzed 01:25, 1 April 2013 (BST)
You know what you done you yak-fucker you. ~Vsig.png 02:04, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Dramatic change? I'll say! Aichon 04:31, 1 April 2013 (BST)
DILDO!--User:Sexualharrison04:57, 2 April 2013
Time's up now, and no new counter-arguments have come up. I'd say Bob's promotion is due. -- Spiderzed 17:14, 2 April 2013 (BST)
I agree. I'll let you process it since I was the one that put it forward. Aichon 20:29, 2 April 2013 (BST)