User talk:Peralta: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
==Regarding danger reports== | ==Regarding danger reports== | ||
Hi thank you for your encouraging template. It definitely made me feel better than feeling silly updating something that people might not use. I've to request though that you don't put the statuses of buildings in Roftwood, Tapton and Pitneybank area that are older than 1 month old to "unknown" yet as there are buildings that I never updated because their statuses are still applicable and the lag on wiki makes it hard and seemingly pointless for me to update them when they're still relevant. I might go back to work on them when I've more time. --[[User:Crystalroselle|Crystal Roselle]] 09:20, 29 May 2013 (UTC) | Hi thank you for your encouraging template. It definitely made me feel better than feeling silly updating something that people might not use. I've to request though that you don't put the statuses of buildings in Roftwood, Tapton and Pitneybank area that are older than 1 month old to "unknown" yet as there are buildings that I never updated because their statuses are still applicable and the lag on wiki makes it hard and seemingly pointless for me to update them when they're still relevant. I might go back to work on them when I've more time. --[[User:Crystalroselle|Crystal Roselle]] 09:20, 29 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
:At this time, I generally only update statuses that are from 2012 or older (several buildings in Lockettside haven't even been updated once since their implementation in 2009!). If a status is still applicable, best update the date, since people don't trust a "safe" report that's several months old anyway ;) {{User:Peralta/Signature}} 10:34, 29 May 2013 (BST) |
Revision as of 09:34, 29 May 2013
Clean slateI moved all of the content on this page to an archive (see the index above). Feel free to post any comments, questions or banter below. PB&J 20:02, 23 May 2013 (BST) Updating Danger ReportsI use 4 months as a cut off for "unknown", not 6 months nor 1 month. 6 months is way too old for a report. 4 months is also too long, but 30 days would, as you say, leave almost no reports at all. --SearchDerelict 21:56, 28 May 2013 (BST) Regarding danger reportsHi thank you for your encouraging template. It definitely made me feel better than feeling silly updating something that people might not use. I've to request though that you don't put the statuses of buildings in Roftwood, Tapton and Pitneybank area that are older than 1 month old to "unknown" yet as there are buildings that I never updated because their statuses are still applicable and the lag on wiki makes it hard and seemingly pointless for me to update them when they're still relevant. I might go back to work on them when I've more time. --Crystal Roselle 09:20, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
|