Talk:82nd Airborne Division/BootCamp: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Anne tardew (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Anne tardew (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
--[[User:Joshua Kennedy|Joshua Kennedy]] 00:52, 3 June 2009 (BST) | --[[User:Joshua Kennedy|Joshua Kennedy]] 00:52, 3 June 2009 (BST) | ||
Seems we have some concerns about Fort Perryn's cades. The Fortress and (among others) have been effective contributors in reclaiming the suburb and the Fort and we are trying to comply with the barricade plan as conditions permit. Currently we are coping with 18-30 zeds outside the gatehouse. We welcome your assistance in holding Survivor gains and ask that you consider the broader context in which we are working. Thank you for your consideration. --[[User:Anne tardew|Anne tardew]] 03:20, 5 July 2009 (BST) | Seems we have some concerns about Fort Perryn's cades. The Fortress and ENVY (among others) have been effective contributors in reclaiming the suburb and the Fort and we are trying to comply with the barricade plan as conditions permit. Currently we are coping with 18-30 zeds outside the gatehouse. We welcome your assistance in holding Survivor gains and ask that you consider the broader context in which we are working. Thank you for your consideration. --[[User:Anne tardew|Anne tardew]] 03:20, 5 July 2009 (BST) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:29, 5 July 2009
-- Spraying --
Hey guys, can you not spray over [R.G.O.W.|Red Guards of Williamsville] sprays, because it really doesn'r help and may start an unnecessary war.
Thank you for your patience --Joshua Kennedy 00:52, 3 June 2009 (BST)
Seems we have some concerns about Fort Perryn's cades. The Fortress and ENVY (among others) have been effective contributors in reclaiming the suburb and the Fort and we are trying to comply with the barricade plan as conditions permit. Currently we are coping with 18-30 zeds outside the gatehouse. We welcome your assistance in holding Survivor gains and ask that you consider the broader context in which we are working. Thank you for your consideration. --Anne tardew 03:20, 5 July 2009 (BST)
