UDWiki:Administration/Promotions: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 22: Line 22:
*:I'd self ban for that. The future looks bright already! --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 13:25, 30 July 2009 (BST)
*:I'd self ban for that. The future looks bright already! --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 13:25, 30 July 2009 (BST)
*'''Vouch''' - Don't really feel the need to elaborate. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 13:55, 30 July 2009 (BST)
*'''Vouch''' - Don't really feel the need to elaborate. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 13:55, 30 July 2009 (BST)
*'''Vouch''' Not much to say, he has done a good job so far. - [[User:Whitehouse]] 14:36, 30 July 2009 (BST)


==Candidates currently under community discussion==
==Candidates currently under community discussion==

Revision as of 13:36, 30 July 2009

Template:Moderationnav Template:Promotions Intro

Candidates still requiring vouches

User:Suicidalangel

I'm putting Suicidalangel up for evaluation as per his biannual promise to the community.

SA has been a sysop for 6 months, and has been a member of the community for years longer. He's been a crat for almost 3 months. As a good user does, he's helped shape/create a few policies here and there in the past, and has mostly a cool head when it comes to drama. He is often active, and always puts his all into helping out with the wiki, in all its parts.

When he can't make it to the computer because of real-life issues, he makes a continued effort to ensure his responsibilities are met punctually through other users. This evaluation bid is an example. He takes this place seriously and has always tried to help out users that need it.

  • Vouch - As always, for me, a vouch comes with trust. I trust SA. --ϑϑ 07:42, 30 July 2009 (BST)
    Thanks for doing this DDR, but wouldn't it have been better off to wait until SA isn't a 'crat any more (so one user doesn't have to make the decision?) Linkthewindow  Talk  07:45, 30 July 2009 (BST)
    He asked me to do this at this time. He'll be adding his own paragraph to the bid tomorrow. --ϑϑ 07:48, 30 July 2009 (BST)
    I was sure he would anyway, but I'm still not sure if it's a good idea :/. Linkthewindow  Talk  07:56, 30 July 2009 (BST)
    You should talk to him then. I am simply fulfilling his request, as he wants his evaluation bid in on time. In US it's still the 29th. --ϑϑ 07:59, 30 July 2009 (BST)
    I know, and I doubt I'll convince him now (especially considering this bid is already under way. It's just that I don't like the idea that one crat can evaluate the other one (without any outside input from another crat,) and they'll be confusion in the (rather unlikely) event that he gets demoted. Linkthewindow  Talk  10:38, 30 July 2009 (BST)
  • fucking no way--CyberRead240 10:04, 30 July 2009 (BST)
  • Vouch - Although, if he gets demoted... and DDR gets banned then it would be Nubis' time to shine! Yeah, it's gonna be a vouch for the greater good.--– Nubis NWO 13:17, 30 July 2009 (BST)
    I'd self ban for that. The future looks bright already! --ϑϑ 13:25, 30 July 2009 (BST)
  • Vouch - Don't really feel the need to elaborate. --Cyberbob 13:55, 30 July 2009 (BST)
  • Vouch Not much to say, he has done a good job so far. - User:Whitehouse 14:36, 30 July 2009 (BST)

Candidates currently under community discussion

There are currently no candidates under community discussion

Recently Concluded Bids

For more concluded bids, see Category:Promotions Candidacies.

Archived Promotions