Lukinswood Barricade Plan: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Since Coram and the EBS came into play, is there any change in cading? Are either of the marked revive points active? Neither are close to an NT. Sorry, new in Lukinswood, hoping to settle in The Coram Building as a member of [[CORAM]]. No one seems to know the best/active RP. --18:06, 23 September 2009 (BST) | Since Coram and the EBS came into play, is there any change in cading? Are either of the marked revive points active? Neither are close to an NT. Sorry, new in Lukinswood, hoping to settle in The Coram Building as a member of [[CORAM]]. No one seems to know the best/active RP. --18:06, 23 September 2009 (BST) | ||
[[Category:Barricade | [[Category:Barricade Plans]] | ||
Revision as of 12:37, 15 October 2009
|
UBP Unreviewed Barricade Plan |
| This barricade plan is under review for compliance with the Uniform Barricading Policy. Comments on this plan may be left here. |
Any suggestions? Please post them in this section
The goal of this plan is to keep Barricades which allow maximum accessiblilty to resources for low-level survivors. Plans and reality often differ greatly. Please follow the Uniform Barricading Policy guidelines, any modifcations to this should allow access within a secure district.
It doesn't make sense that Club Hill [29, 48] should be an entry point... it's a dark building; it should be a EHB safehouse. Especially when there's another adjacent entry point. --Silisquish 23:46, 14 October 2008 (BST)
Since Coram and the EBS came into play, is there any change in cading? Are either of the marked revive points active? Neither are close to an NT. Sorry, new in Lukinswood, hoping to settle in The Coram Building as a member of CORAM. No one seems to know the best/active RP. --18:06, 23 September 2009 (BST)
