UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/NWO vs Cobra, Aichon and RadicalWhig: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::The reason 'such pages' can be made is because they're not making up ridiculous shit about you to make you look bad. Everything on that page, aside from some commentary, ''was said by you''. Had it all been outright slander, the precedent is that it should be moved to userspace. ''You'' brought this to arbitration, apparently without researching a damn thing, judging by your arguments, and this is the appropriate ruling. Had you done your research and developed a convincing argument beyond "this hurts my feelings", you would have stood a very good chance of swaying my decision. --{{User:DT/Signature}} 02:25, 16 September 2013 (BST) | ::The reason 'such pages' can be made is because they're not making up ridiculous shit about you to make you look bad. Everything on that page, aside from some commentary, ''was said by you''. Had it all been outright slander, the precedent is that it should be moved to userspace. ''You'' brought this to arbitration, apparently without researching a damn thing, judging by your arguments, and this is the appropriate ruling. Had you done your research and developed a convincing argument beyond "this hurts my feelings", you would have stood a very good chance of swaying my decision. --{{User:DT/Signature}} 02:25, 16 September 2013 (BST) | ||
The weird and wonderful moment when somebody stumbles upon the right decision by entirely ridiculous logic.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 02:14, 16 September 2013 (BST) | The weird and wonderful moment when somebody stumbles upon the right decision by entirely ridiculous logic.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 02:14, 16 September 2013 (BST) | ||
:Go back to being Shortround. --{{User:DT/Signature}} 02:26, 16 September 2013 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 01:26, 16 September 2013
Headers (no, not those Headers, the other ones)
That page has just started, and already it has become a mess to navigate and edit. Would anyone mind if the various statements were turned into proper headers? (e.g., ===Happy 24 7's First Statement:===) -- Spiderzed█ 16:03, 13 September 2013 (BST)
- DT needs to give it the okay, but I'm definitely in support. I nearly did it myself yesterday. —Aichon— 16:18, 13 September 2013 (BST)
what a great way to cap off the summer!
|
Because Harrison |
| That's why. |
--User:Sexualharrison14:57, 15 September 2013
The Ruling
I don't mind restraints (it was what I was expecting), but they really need to receive a time limit. An arbitration ruling that effectively restrains the involved parties until the end of time isn't really valid. It are typically 1-3 months that such restraining rulings are held up, but YMMV. -- Spiderzed█ 23:54, 15 September 2013 (BST)
- I wanted something more interesting. Half way I stopped caring because of how the case was going. DT just ended up saying, I can't do shit about this. It's too bad we can't come to some kind of conclusion, Spider. Radical is still an attention whore. Still disappoint. At the same time, I'm sure Cobra(given its past drama - in the past lawl) or any other PKer group wouldn't want a page like BONWO and now it's clear that such pages can be made, thanks to Radical. NEVAR FORGET!!! -.- 00:05, 16 September 2013 (BST)
- The reason 'such pages' can be made is because they're not making up ridiculous shit about you to make you look bad. Everything on that page, aside from some commentary, was said by you. Had it all been outright slander, the precedent is that it should be moved to userspace. You brought this to arbitration, apparently without researching a damn thing, judging by your arguments, and this is the appropriate ruling. Had you done your research and developed a convincing argument beyond "this hurts my feelings", you would have stood a very good chance of swaying my decision. --DT
PK 02:25, 16 September 2013 (BST)
- The reason 'such pages' can be made is because they're not making up ridiculous shit about you to make you look bad. Everything on that page, aside from some commentary, was said by you. Had it all been outright slander, the precedent is that it should be moved to userspace. You brought this to arbitration, apparently without researching a damn thing, judging by your arguments, and this is the appropriate ruling. Had you done your research and developed a convincing argument beyond "this hurts my feelings", you would have stood a very good chance of swaying my decision. --DT
The weird and wonderful moment when somebody stumbles upon the right decision by entirely ridiculous logic.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 02:14, 16 September 2013 (BST)
