UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/JebJ vs Kirsty Cotton: Difference between revisions
Rosslessness (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Rosslessness (talk | contribs) (→So) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::I prefer the old-fashioned chewbacca defense. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 09:46, 18 December 2014 (UTC) | ::I prefer the old-fashioned chewbacca defense. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">▋</span>]]</span>''' 09:46, 18 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
Still no UDwiki based precedent. I'm trying to help here. Not everything is about ''Ethics in Video Games''. | Still no UDwiki based precedent. I'm trying to help here. Not everything is about ''Ethics in Video Games''.--[[User:Rosslessness|<span style="color: MidnightBlue ">R</span><span style="color: Navy">o</span><span style="color: DarkBlue">s</span><span style="color: MediumBlue">s</span><span style="color: RoyalBlue"></span>]][[User_Talk:Rosslessness|<span style="color: RoyalBlue">l</span><span style="color: CornflowerBlue">e</span><span style="color: SkyBlue">s</span><span style="color: LightskyBlue">s</span>]][[User:Rosslessness/Safehouse_Hatred|<span style="color: LightBlue">n</span><span style="color: PowderBlue">e</span>]][[Monroeville Many|<span style="color: PaleTurquoise">s</span>]][[Location Page Building Toolkit|<span style="color: PaleTurquoise">s</span>]] 00:45, 24 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
== Intermission == | == Intermission == | ||
I'll be traveling with limited access to internet for a couple of weeks. If this case has continued when I return, I'll post my ruling then. If there's been no other activity when I return, I'll likely archive this as a withdrawn Arbitration case. Merry Christmas everyone. ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>23:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)</sub> | I'll be traveling with limited access to internet for a couple of weeks. If this case has continued when I return, I'll post my ruling then. If there's been no other activity when I return, I'll likely archive this as a withdrawn Arbitration case. Merry Christmas everyone. ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>23:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)</sub> |
Revision as of 00:45, 24 December 2014
So
Using non wiki sources is interesting. I'd have looked closer at the 2cool VB cases for on wiki evidence.--Rosslessness 21:28, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Potential evidence as 'threat' not being acted upon, although not completely relevant. This would have really been an interesting case to arbitrate, really bummed I couldn't. A ZOMBIE ANT 00:30, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Likewise. It gets down to the nuts and bolts of UDwiki. Does the right of one person to roleplay take precedent over another. Obviously my bias is clear on this one. --Rosslessness 15:31, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- I guess I can weigh in on this discussion, even though I'm involved. There is no roleplay attempt in the removal of "offensive" material. So, I view it more, does one user have the right to censor another user's roleplaying. On a side note, the nallan case should have been vandalism. Personal opinion: if you say "I'm/we/him are going to x irl" you should only do it to someone who knows you are joking and is okay with it. However, drop the "irl", not vandalism. --K 22:57, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Obviously I shouldn't say much or else I'd sway the case. But I wanted to say I think it's a very interesting case. I kind of wish it were moving a bit faster, but I'll just assume Jeb is building an awesome closing statement and needs a bit more time to nail down the details ~ 23:38, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Still no UDwiki based precedent. I'm trying to help here. Not everything is about Ethics in Video Games.--Rosslessness 00:45, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Intermission
I'll be traveling with limited access to internet for a couple of weeks. If this case has continued when I return, I'll post my ruling then. If there's been no other activity when I return, I'll likely archive this as a withdrawn Arbitration case. Merry Christmas everyone. ~ 23:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)