UDWiki talk:Administration/Policy Discussion/Signature Policy Revamp: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==General Comments & Overall Structure== | ==General Comments & Overall Structure== | ||
Is it OK if I make a couple of punctuation fixes? {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 03:54, 11 October 2015 (UTC) | Is it OK if I make a couple of punctuation fixes? {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 03:54, 11 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
:Sure, although I expect to add/change it over the next few days <small>-- [[User:Boxy|boxy]] 05:59, 11 October 2015 (BST)</small> | |||
==Why do we need signatures== | ==Why do we need signatures== | ||
Shouldn't the signature be required to link to the user's page (or character page) "and/or" their talk page? (or maybe "and"?) {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 03:51, 11 October 2015 (UTC) | Shouldn't the signature be required to link to the user's page (or character page) "and/or" their talk page? (or maybe "and"?) {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 03:51, 11 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
:Yep, "and/or" <small>-- [[User:Boxy|boxy]] 05:59, 11 October 2015 (BST)</small> | |||
==Personalized signatures== | ==Personalized signatures== | ||
Line 11: | Line 13: | ||
==Disruptive signatures== | ==Disruptive signatures== | ||
Better, but I still say limit the visible length to the 255 character limit of the Nickname field in Preferences. --[[User:Axe Hack|<span style="width: 50%; border: 1px solid red; background-color: #000000; text-align: justify; box-shadow: 2px 2px 5px silver; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; color: white; font-size:smaller;">•▬ ▬••▬ •</span>]] [[User talk:Axe Hack|<span style="width: 50%; border: 1px solid red; background-color: #000000; text-align: justify; box-shadow: 2px 2px 5px silver; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; color: white; font-size:smaller;">•••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬</span>]] <sup><sup><sup><sup><sup><i>#nerftemplatedsigs</i></sup></sup></sup></sup></sup> 05:30, 11 October 2015 (UTC) | Better, but I still say limit the visible length to the 255 character limit of the Nickname field in Preferences. --[[User:Axe Hack|<span style="width: 50%; border: 1px solid red; background-color: #000000; text-align: justify; box-shadow: 2px 2px 5px silver; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; color: white; font-size:smaller;">•▬ ▬••▬ •</span>]] [[User talk:Axe Hack|<span style="width: 50%; border: 1px solid red; background-color: #000000; text-align: justify; box-shadow: 2px 2px 5px silver; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; color: white; font-size:smaller;">•••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬</span>]] <sup><sup><sup><sup><sup><i>#nerftemplatedsigs</i></sup></sup></sup></sup></sup> 05:30, 11 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
:I really think we should worry about defining hard limits in separate amendments later (for ones that arn't already in place) <small>-- [[User:Boxy|boxy]] 05:59, 11 October 2015 (BST)</small> |
Revision as of 05:59, 11 October 2015
This is basically my view of what signatures should be. Basically they are there for identification. Personalisation is a good thing to encourage, but shouldn't impact on the primary purpose of the sig (identification) or the wiki itself -- boxy 02:50, 11 October 2015 (BST)
General Comments & Overall Structure
Is it OK if I make a couple of punctuation fixes? Bob Moncrief EBD•W! 03:54, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- Sure, although I expect to add/change it over the next few days -- boxy 05:59, 11 October 2015 (BST)
Why do we need signatures
Shouldn't the signature be required to link to the user's page (or character page) "and/or" their talk page? (or maybe "and"?) Bob Moncrief EBD•W! 03:51, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- Yep, "and/or" -- boxy 05:59, 11 October 2015 (BST)
Personalized signatures
Disruptive signatures
Better, but I still say limit the visible length to the 255 character limit of the Nickname field in Preferences. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 05:30, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- I really think we should worry about defining hard limits in separate amendments later (for ones that arn't already in place) -- boxy 05:59, 11 October 2015 (BST)