User:DanceDanceRevolution/sandpit/quotepit
| Iscariot said: |
| I invite you to explain why you are obeying these rules constitutes a difference with Cheese's rules explains the difference between what you're saying and precedence's example. |
| Cyberbob240 said: |
| youre such a bastion of INTELLECTUAL INTEGRITY ddr (see how mature i am) would it be acceptable to you if i was to allow you to use my arse as a receptacle for your penis and in return you support my side of the argument |
Why should I give a shit what you put on your page? I don't bother reading much of it because it's not policy, and even if I felt the need to discuss anything there, any comment I make would be summarily deleted regardless of it's merit.
- -- Boxy-- responding to Iscariot, who was scratching around for the sysops to act by the demands specified on one of his user sub-pages (against clear-cut policy).
YES - speaking on behalf of the Rolt Heights Vigilante Patrol, Imperium of Man was one of our allies for a time, they were also an ally and member of the Dulston Alliance, they assisted with two defences of RHVP's HQ during zed insurgents and Garviel put some quite lucid comments and advice forward on the Dulston Alliance forums. I think as a group they had an impact, even if that impact resulted in the "Imperium must die" campaign and BTW their were many allies involved in that cafuffle and I would say it was a close run thing, but the DORIS bunch got a kickin' by many estimations. TBH that fire fight was largely won from the DA perspective because the majority of anti PK'er groups NE of Malton decided to attend to have a free for all, happily for IOM this was also the same time and place for their showdown. Anyhow it's historical now and therefore should be voted in that way. - Winner of the award for outstanding failure in the field of signing your vote is... anonymous! --The Grimch U! E! 01:38, 26 July 2008 (BST)
He frequently makes very good points... just a shame he can't make them without being abusive, arrogant and obnoxious! I think a popular vote would be a bad idea as there is every possibility that he would meat puppet it his way. My preference would be for a Sysop/Crat vote with 100% needed to pull any serious rules swerve such as an instant 3 month ban.... 1 month on the other hand might serve as a reasonable warning that he needs to stop being such a dick! --Honestmistake 19:54, 2 June 2009 (BST)
| Honestmistake said: |
| I would like to think we have about as little in common as is possible for two UD players who Bob dislikes! |
| Honestmistake said: |
| He frequently makes very good points... |
- 0wn3d --Cyberbob 20:09, 2 June 2009 (BST)
| Honestmistake said: |
| I see no merit in arguing with you Bob [followed by 66 words] |
