UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration
While the wiki community attempts to work on the basis of encouragement and cooperation, there are occasions where wiki users find themselves unable to reach accord. In the event of this happening, the Arbitration Team may be called upon to intervene, and attempt to find a reasonable compromise that, while perhaps not satisfying both parties, may at least assist in defusing the situation, thanks to the unbiased third party.
Guidelines for Arbitration Requests
In assisting in Arbitration, we generally suggest that both parties agree to the Arbitration. This is not, by any means, a requirement, but we do require that both parties be represented in proceedings.
Any Arbitration request should provide at least the following:
- The aggrieved parties. Either person vs person, or [list of people] vs [list of people].
- The reason for the arbitration. This should very specifically be without reference to people, as that information has already been provided. It should be a short paragraph indicating the causes of the aggrievement, and why both parties feel it requires arbitration
- Any pages affected by the aggrievement. This should be a simple list of links.
Once the Arbitration commences, the Arbitrator will request statements from all parties involved. Any evidence to back up one's statement should be provided in link form. Each party will then have an opportunity to rebut their opponent's statement. After these two steps, the Arbitrator will then consider the case, and reach a conclusion, and determine the outcome that is required. It's the duty of the Arbitrator to move a case he accepted to a subpage of UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration, and to update the status of the arbitration case in the Arbitration Cases in Progress section.
As a note, by requesting an Arbitration, all parties are thus obliged to accept the outcome of the Arbitration. Not doing will be considered Vandalism, and such vandalism attempts will be treated as if the vandal has already received two warnings.
After the Arbitration is over, it will then be moved to an archive page. As publicly accessible pages, they may be used to establish precedent in further, applicable cases.
Current Arbitrators
- For guidelines on how to arbitrate, see Arbitration Guidelines.
The following users have placed their hand up as users who are willing to be contacted to act as an Arbitrator. The role of Arbitrator is not restricted to the Administration Team; any user can be contacted as an Arbitrator (even if not listed below) and use this page for the arbitration, so long as both parties agree to the Arbitrator. Users who wish to place their hand up as an Arbitrator should place their name below on the list, using *{{usr|YourUserPage}}
Also note that not all listed Arbitrators are active on the Wiki.
|
Volunteer Arbitrators in Alphabetical Order | ||||
Arbitration Cases Currently Under Consideration
| Administration Notice |
| Use this header to create new arbitration cases. Once all sides have chosen an arbiter, move the case to a sub-page of UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration and update its status in the Arbitration Cases in Progress section. |
Arbitration Cases in Progress
Active cases
Iscariot v. Taco2
Excuse me, I'm new so I apologize if I did anything wrong. One of the administrators here (In the UK Rage) came into my talk page and started leaving me abusive and foul messages because I didn't do something on my page correctly. THis person also made threats to "run me off the wiki." I would like to report this person's behavior because this is the kind of thing that makes people leave and no longer participate. YOu can read it on my talk page under "admin pages." I will refrain from responding to this person any longer. Thank you for treating my complaint seriously. Sincerely, --Taco2 19:51, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Recently Concluded cases
Iscariot vs MisterGame
| Involved Users | Iscariot vs. MisterGame |
| Arbitrator | N/A |
| Created | 11:18, 18 October 2009 (BST) by Iscariot |
| Status | Abandoned |
| Summary | Iscariot was not satisfied by Mistergame's arbitration ruling at Cyberbob, Sexylegsread and DanceDanceRevolution vs 2 Cool and wished for a compromise. |
AegisTyra vs Dhavid Grohl
| Involved Users | AegisTyra vs. Dhavid Grohl |
| Arbitrator | Rosslessness |
| Created | 11:14, 23 November 2009 (UTC) by Rosslessness |
| Status | Completed. |
| Summary | A dispute over a TZH suppage. |
Cyberbob, Sexylegsread and DanceDanceRevolution vs 2 Cool
| Involved Users | Cyberbob, Read and DDR vs. 2 Cool (J3D) and (Nick) |
| Arbitrator | Thadeous Oakley |
| Created | 09:13, 3 September 2009 (BST) by Cyberbob |
| Status | Concluded |
| Summary | Cyberbob, Read and DDR want to be removed from J3D's and Nick's 2 Cool fanclub page |
