User talk:Amazing/Myths

First!

It's good to finally hear your side of the story.

The TOS can be found easily enough; that link enumerates them as they've been (tentatively) determined to apply to this site/users thereof.

Also, you might want to move that note at the bottom to the top, given that I'd already fixed the link to Sacred Ground Policy well before I got that far. Wiki pages are editable by default; assuming good faith, edits intended to improve an article are generally not considered vandalism.

Cheers! ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 06:52, 21 May 2011 (BST)

Ah, interesting to finally see that. Wow, though, this thing easily rules out what I would guess to be around 33% of the wiki. Heh.

As for the stuff about not editing the page, I'm just carrying over the ass-covering from the times in ancient history when people would make "helpful" edits because you clearly needed an NPoV section that contradicted everything you said right at the top of the page, etc. etc. etc. - I would assume, perhaps incorrectly, that the fact that this page is of my creation and within my "User" space that I would have a say in who could or couldn't edit it. Not the case? If not, I might go for protection at some point. Just in case, because you never know. :) -- Amazing‽ (UD + WTF = HR) 07:24, 21 May 2011 (BST)

Yeah, I know, right?
And you do get to revert unwanted edits and report them to A/VB if they're persistent/obviously bad faith; just pointing out that userspace isn't automatically inviolable and that warnings work best if you try to make sure people read them. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 12:49, 21 May 2011 (BST)

who cares? most of if not all of those people are gone. think you could trim it down a bit for the mildly interested? walls of text blow.--User:Sexualharrison14:08, 21 May 2011 (utc) 14:08, 21 May 2011 (BST)