UDWiki talk:Administration/Arbitration/JebJ vs Kirsty Cotton
So
Using non wiki sources is interesting. I'd have looked closer at the 2cool VB cases for on wiki evidence.--Rosslessness 21:28, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Potential evidence as 'threat' not being acted upon, although not completely relevant. This would have really been an interesting case to arbitrate, really bummed I couldn't. A ZOMBIE ANT 00:30, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- Likewise. It gets down to the nuts and bolts of UDwiki. Does the right of one person to roleplay take precedent over another. Obviously my bias is clear on this one. --Rosslessness 15:31, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
- I guess I can weigh in on this discussion, even though I'm involved. There is no roleplay attempt in the removal of "offensive" material. So, I view it more, does one user have the right to censor another user's roleplaying. On a side note, the nallan case should have been vandalism. Personal opinion: if you say "I'm/we/him are going to x irl" you should only do it to someone who knows you are joking and is okay with it. However, drop the "irl", not vandalism. --K 22:57, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Obviously I shouldn't say much or else I'd sway the case. But I wanted to say I think it's a very interesting case. I kind of wish it were moving a bit faster, but I'll just assume Jeb is building an awesome closing statement and needs a bit more time to nail down the details 
~
23:38, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Still no UDwiki based precedent. I'm trying to help here. Not everything is about Ethics in Video Games.--Rosslessness 00:45, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Intermission
I'll be traveling with limited access to internet for a couple of weeks. If this case has continued when I return, I'll post my ruling then. If there's been no other activity when I return, I'll likely archive this as a withdrawn Arbitration case. Merry Christmas everyone. ~ 23:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
