| leave me a message
Newest discussions first, please!
Good Day
Good day to you my dearest friend,
the shell is new but here I stand
Are these the men we are to kill?
Enter their home to work our will?
I leave this note here for you then;
Correspond soon.
- Sincerely,
- S.N
- I believe this is what you mean? Example problem, Example answer.
- But I bare some bad news; it seems we have a zerg in the midst of our enemies... But I think I've handled it for the moment (although this blackzilla character seems to be a higher up in the group, so who knows what fresh hell may be upon us.)
- Also, this just in:
http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=265981
http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=288441
http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1622691
http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=188535
http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1527980
http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1134139
http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1196976
http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=793272
http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=789556
http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=188723
- TRO has a forum and I wandered through their (rather short) member list. They claim secrecy but it seems they don't do as they preach; the links were in their signatures *maniacal laughter* I figure there are only one or two I couldn't find on their forums.
- Vanitas Mori 01:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- I found the same about blackzilla and snapped some screen caps. Hopefully this will resolve itself with haste - I don't intend on putting up with zerging in the middle of my legitimate fun. Good work on the profiles. It seems like there's a few of them around that Greatorex area, plus our assumed zerg friend. -- RH
 PK | burning chiton 09:44, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Wondering if you could lend a hand
Hey there. I was pointed in your direction by Gunslinger, after asking for help with some wiki coding involving boxes and the like. He said you were pretty good at the stuff, so I decided to drop you a line in case you could help. My problem is that I'm trying to rig the boxes on this page to sit alongside each other, in a row of three across, but all I can seem to manage is getting them to sit under each other in a column. Do you know where it is I've gone wrong? If you could point it out to me I can finish the coding myself, so there's no need to worry about taking any real time on it. Thanks in advance, and don't sweat it if it's any hassle, I can ponder it some more if you haven't the free time. 
- Thanks very much, man. You're a gentleman and a scholar.
Philosophe
Brother RH, now Reader RH.
The news of your elevation to Philosophe came to me through various and sundry sources, and I wish to offer my most sincere congratulations. You are, of course, a most welcome addition to the Tower. Praise Knowledge! --Ov 12:45, 23 April 2009 (EST)
The Surrealists
I hear that you're handling The Surrealists, true? If so, are you open to new members? --Pestolence(talk) 00:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Cancel that, sorry. --Pestolence(talk) 00:17, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
- All right, then. The character I was planning to use is wrapped up now, but maybe once I'm finished with what I'm currently doing, I'll come look you guys up. --Pestolence(talk) 17:18, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Side Boxes
I, good sir, noticed while browsing your wiki pages that the navigation boxes don't seem to keep the same width. I assume this bothers you as much as it bothers me, and as such I'm giving you the wiki code that fixes that horrible problem:
{| style="padding:2px; vertical-align:top; background-color:#2E2E2E; border:solid 1px #000000; width: 100%"
|
'''[[Link]]'''<br/>
<small>''sub-text''</small>
|}
The problem with the Knight's original navigation code, is that if there isn't enough text to fill the box, it wont be the same size as the other boxes. Adding the "width: 100%" makes them all the same size.
Best regard,
Vigeous RHA 06:40, 19 August 2008 (BST)
- I went ahead and fixed the box in our talk page. Just take that and rework it for your other boxes. I believe the reason you were having trouble is because you might have forgotten to add the semi-colon after. "style="width 100% border:" instead of "style=width 100%; border:" Vigeous RHA 11:08, 22 August 2008 (BST)
| 
