Template talk:Goonsig
Can't wait to see how many pages this will break. <noinclude> tags, while preventing info from being transcluded does not keep that info from template call limits. ~
20:36, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- Let's find out, shall we? --█████████████ 20:38, 1 May 2011 (BST)
- “‘What is lack of reading comprehension,’ Alex?” █████████████ 20:42, 1 May 2011 (BST)
Whoa, coolsig broheim █████████████ 20:40, 1 May 2011 (BST)
This new one is even hotter--█████████████ 20:52, 1 May 2011 (BST)
POSTING MY PANTY-WETTING APPROVAL OF THIS SIG --
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 21:00, 1 May 2011 (BST)
Aw shit |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 21:07, 1 May 2011 (BST)
I recommend a blue, blue, blue, blue: █████████████ --Akule Maker of fine, hand-crafted UDWiki sass since 2006 -- Akule School's back in session™ 21:47, 1 May 2011 (BST)
So what's the point
Same question I ask Revenant but addressed to the general Goon population since he doesn't want to take ownership in this. What's the point of gaming the system like this. Is there some problem with the sig policy? Retribution for warning a Goon about their sig? Or just outright trolling? According to WIKI LAW, signing with this thing is pretty much vandalism. So how should this be handled? Can we cut the BS and red tape and just stop using this as a sig? ~ 22:57, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
