UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Update Reevaluation Procedure

Specifically, extending the one week of discussion to two weeks, much like other promotion procedures like sysops bids and crat elections. Basically, I find one week to short at the moment, I don't think I'm alone in here.

According to the current policy:

Current Policy said:

The reason for only one week for discussions is due to the high-profile nature of the sysops, and most users should be familiar with them

As listed here. Sounds rather vague to me. Considering the high-profile nature, I'd say there is no reason to make it shorter. We're basically discussing the activity of a sysops for the past eight months, surely this process could take a little longer? I think making it two weeks does no harm, and can easily lead to more input of more users. Seeing as the sysops position is a valuable one, more input can only benefit both the community and the re-evaluation candidate at hand, not to mention making it more easier for crats to make a well-rounded decision.

Thoughts? (Talk page please)

(Also, if the are other concerns regarding the current RE policy let it be known)

-- Thadeous Oakley Talk 14:37, 26 June 2011 (BST)