User talk:Reverend Loki

Feel free to leave your comments here. --Reverend Loki 17:07, 3 Feb 2006 (GMT)

Loki, in response to your comment to me on the suggestion talk page on the loclaized time dealie, I'd like to point out that I was NOT referign to Watches, like you assumed, but CLOCK --Jak Rhee 12:44, 8 Feb 2006 (GMT)

Ultimate Emote Deluxe is indeed very good I must say that at first I was sceptical, but this is more then just plain emote. kudos of making something basic into a fully fleshed out workable suggestion with solutions for everybody. (and yeah, this is me making amends for being a bit of an ass)--Vista 12:08, 18 February 2006 (GMT)

I can understand you think that, but as Duping isn't about the quality of the suggestion but about simply removing a suggestion because of redundancy that isn't the case. Because there is already a suggestion like it that achieves the same goal in pretty much the same manner. Both quality and status of the suggestion duping it is immaterial

As we've got about a hundred or more suggestion in peer reviewed and not everybody knows them, keeps are inevatable. making duping unnessercarely difficult. Because of that, the rule is: Three people have to vote Dupe and a link needs to posted. that is all, no 2/3 requirement when it has a keep vote. (that would make Duping peer reviewed suggestions almost impossible, with over a hundred suggestions in peer reviewed every dupe from there is bound to get a lot of keep votes, not that many people now the archives that well.) There is at the moment quite some talk about chaning the rules to make dupe more limited to peer reviewed suggestion giving failed suggestions a chance, but that is just talk right now. Because some people do try to use dupe as old style spam, some discretion is neccersary. But as the suggestion linked too was from peer reviewed and the mechanical differances non-revolutionary (quite standard even) that wasn't the case here.

Hoped to have anwsered your question --Vista ^W! 23:30, 21 March 2006 (GMT)

Actually, I just found out you were right, the Dupe vote was included in Jon Pyre spam vote change and thus requires 7 votes and 2/3 part. but as it wasn't included in the discussion or part of the actual problem, most people (including me) just read over it. So you were right and I was wrong. (Well it's almost easter, egg on my face would be in season)--Vista ^W! 23:41, 15 April 2006 (BST)

You're going to need to give me more to go on if you expect me to respond to your comment in my talk. Velkrin 03:34, 10 April 2006 (BST)

Sorry bout that, had to leave for a party and kinda rushed it. HamsterNinja 03:04, 9 May 2006 (BST)