User talk:MisterGame

Still around

Hey

Hey it Fanglord! I'm from UC if you remember me, just wondering how you're doing and what you've been up to all this time. For the most part things are still the same at UC, lots of inactivity, largely due to the game... Most of the same people are still around, although I'm CEO, Chairman now. Anyway, I hope you're doing good. Hope to hear from you soon! --Chairman Fanglord, 21:26, 29 August 2011 (BST)

Warning

- Please ensure you follow the guidelines and go through the proper procedure when banning users. Banning users without reason is an abuse of sysop powers and any repetition of this will be seen as Misconduct. -- Cheese 23:20, 11 July 2011 (BST)

Ahahaha, you just lost any moral highground you ever claimed to have. --DevilAsh  ^{|  T  |  яя  |} 23:42, 11 July 2011 (BST)

I'm sorry, but who were you again? -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 15:13, 12 July 2011 (BST)

And now, it seems, you have also lost the ability to read. Or were just trying to be funny; one of the two. --DevilAsh  ^{|  T  |  яя  |} 15:33, 12 July 2011 (BST)

Oh sorry, didn't mean to offend your ego by not immediately recognizing you. You must be one of those people that need special attention once in a while. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 15:48, 12 July 2011 (BST)

OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOo. --DevilAsh  ^{|  T  |  яя  |} 15:53, 12 July 2011 (BST)

Goddamit Thad

Stop getting all the good awards. >:( --Yonnua Koponen ^{T G P} ^^^ 23:36, 1 July 2011 (BST)

Can't help that I'm just that good. If there is one thing I have to say about it, it's why it's called the Grimmies. The Thaddies would be much more suitable. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 06:49, 2 July 2011 (BST)

Surely the Oakleys rolls off the tongue more effectively?--Yonnua Koponen ^{T G P} ^^^ 09:52, 4 July 2011 (BST)

Its a play on words dear fellows. --Rosslessness 10:31, 4 July 2011 (BST)

^ Grimmies = Grammies, brilliant on more levels than thaddies. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 10:47, 4 July 2011 (BST)

I know what it means, t'was more a nod towards the fact that almost the entire event revolves around certain users getting off on how "bad" I am as a sysops/person. The butts must be really hurting over there.-- Thadeous Oakley Talk 15:30, 4 July 2011 (BST)

Why do you always say certain users when you mean most? --Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 16:10, 4 July 2011 (BST)

I said certain and I meant certain. Don't worry, I can think for myself. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 16:54, 4 July 2011 (BST)

Hey Karek, why don't you get back to not arbitrating that case of yours.--Yonnua Koponen ^{T G P} ^^^ 17:39, 4 July 2011 (BST)

• insert belligerant serious comment here* --DevilAsh  ^{|  T  |  яя  |} 17:41, 4 July 2011 (BST)

CHILL OUT

It is nice to see you again, Thad. Cheers,--CyAdora 18:46, 17 May 2011 (BST)

use kid gloves with the goons thad. you are giving them the reaction that they are looking for. relax.--    bitch  16:17, 3 May 2011 (utc)

Actually, I'm not MAD at all in regard to the goons. Honestly, I understand they are just trolling for attention. If you look closely you'll see I'm mostly ignoring their attacks at me. However, I do think we need to fix and prevent any vandalism done. Like those idiotic sigs, something that to my surprise was even obvious to you. They may think their trolling the place, but most ops are generally just rolling alone. It's not much to get all excited/angry/whatever about.-- Thadeous Oakley Talk 16:43, 4 May 2011 (BST)

You really are an idiot. --DevilAsh  ^{|  T  |  яя  |} 20:26, 18 August 2011 (BST)

Awwww, poor baby not getting enough attention again? You're only replying to a more than 3 month old topic. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 20:48, 18 August 2011 (BST)

FEED ME MOAR. --DevilAsh  ^{|  T  |  яя  |} 20:52, 18 August 2011 (BST)

Nono. Then you'll get all chubby-like, and the mean kids won't let you ride-a their tricycle.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:15, 18 August 2011 (BST)

Urrrrp

Why'd you protect your page? I got an update saying that you'd created your page, and came over all like 'LOLWUT' to find out what you'd done. --DevilAsh  ^{|  T  |  яя  |} 14:52, 1 May 2011 (BST)

I unprotected my page, something I forgot to do after my self-ban. Interesting to know you got my userpage on your watchlist. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 16:43, 4 May 2011 (BST)

It's not unusual to watch an op's user page. At least I do, and have already done so before I've become an op. Many administration-relevant discussions happen on them. And there are occassionally newbs who ask for/about things on a random op's page - seeing them timely helps to help them more timely. -- Spiderzed█ 16:49, 4 May 2011 (BST)

This was about my userpage though, not my talk page. Whatever, recent changes > watchlist, for me anyway. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 16:52, 4 May 2011 (BST)

You can't watch the talk page without watching also the user page. Personally, I use my watch list to get a quick overview over the most important pages or pages I keep an eye on, and then use RC to check on the remainder. -- Spiderzed█ 16:59, 4 May 2011 (BST)

	Stalker
	This user stalks the Recent Changes page.

Maybe I'll try that. Already got the stalker template, check template section, thanks anyway though. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 17:05, 4 May 2011 (BST)

I stalk everyone --Karloth Vois ^¯\(°_o)/¯ 17:35, 4 May 2011 (BST)

Sig

So, uhm, wondering. Why even bother with a white background when most all of the skins are already white and the one that isn't it's not visible on. Just seems like needless code really.--Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 09:16, 30 April 2011 (BST)

I love needless code! No seriously, if it bothers you feel free to provide me a fix, I don't care either way. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 16:43, 4 May 2011 (BST)

it's more that you don't even need it. As far as I can tell it serves no purpose and without knowing what you were going for I can't change that.--Karek^{maps 2.0?!} 16:51, 4 May 2011 (BST)

I'm going for a combination of maroon and boldblack text on a white background, liek my userpages. Sometimes it does serve a purpose, mostly on other people's colored talkpages. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 16:57, 4 May 2011 (BST)

I am So Curious

Hey bro sweet blackbird. Just curious what you want me to shut the fuck up about? --甘いノーム愛感覚的の私の型板!!! 07:33, 20 April 2011 (BST)

Some Advice

It's generally not a good idea to discourage users, sysops included, from admitting they were wrong. It tends to both backfire and make the wiki a less productive place. --Karek^maps?! 08:33, 15 April 2011 (BST)

Karek is wrong. --Rosslessness 12:28, 15 April 2011 (BST)

Karek is always wrong. --カシュー, ザ ゾンビ クィーン (ビープ ビープ) @ 12:29, 15 April 2011 (BST)

He'll never admit it though -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 12:47 15 April 2011 (BST)

Karek is never wrong! --Karloth Vois ^¯\(°_o)/¯ 13:37, 15 April 2011 (BST)

Karek is wikinese for wrong. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 14:58, 15 April 2011 (BST)

I completely forgot what this was about. Help? -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 16:43, 4 May 2011 (BST)

Thanks

For taking action on the DHPD page vandalism. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 07:50, 9 April 2011 (BST)

We'll do our best. I don't think anyone wants a wiki war, though we've 50-80 people to coordinate and The Dead have a whole lot more than that. Purple Cat ~ DHPD 16:59, 9 April 2011 (BST)

As per PCat - many thanks Sanpedro 00:24, 11 April 2011 (BST)

bold

If you're going to yell at people to bold their rulings you might as well play suite and not bold stuff like Meh as if it's a ruling. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 01:50, 5 April 2011 (BST)

Pretty sure that was his ruling. His meaning with it was pretty clear. --Karek^maps?! 09:06, 5 April 2011 (BST)

I know. But he's been shoving the need for formalities up the other sysops' arses for the last week or so, so I think perhaps he should have the courtesy to make a practice of it too, for the sake of those who tally the rulings when taking action on the case. Not too much to ask. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 10:41, 5 April 2011 (BST)

I asked Axe Hack kindly here once if he would bold his rulings for clarification in a case where the sysops were split, and where there was (again) a lot of discussion, which could have lead to people overlooking his ruling. I'll make sure to be more clear myself as well next time, but if the situation arises again feel free to ignore my ruling if it isn't clear. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 11:10, 5 April 2011 (BST)

My apologies, I was quite sure you'd done it twice. maybe you asked him on a/vb and his talk page, I thought you'd gone on a bit more of a crusade, never mind then. Btw I think it's a good thing, uniforming rulings again, as we all remember the time J3D was misconducted and demoted for having an unbolded 'nup' count as a ruling ;D -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 11:45, 5 April 2011 (BST)

No problem, I'll watch out, ha. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 22:07, 5 April 2011 (BST)

Confuzzled

Why did you change our groups redirect? Was there something I'm doing wrong? --DevilAsh  ^{|  T  |  яя  |} 20:49, 3 April 2011 (BST)

Mega-confused myself. Either I had a black-out, because I don't remember doing this at all, or my computer has achieved self-awareness.-- Thadeous Oakley Talk 20:55, 3 April 2011 (BST)

Maybe I accidentally pressed the roll-back button (a special sysops-only undo button) while viewing the page, regardless, my apologies; really didn't mean to do so. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 20:58, 3 April 2011 (BST)

The sysop time machine is broken! Don't worry. As long as you hit that wire with the connecting hook at precisely 88mph the instant the lightning strikes the tower... everything will be fine. --Karloth Vois ^¯\(°_o)/¯ 23:30, 3 April 2011 (BST)

See ya…

…when you get back. I've got a promo bid running and would be interested in your input. ЯЭV⁠€⁠NΛИ† 09:46, 29 March 2011 (BST)

Will answer your question(s) when I get a chance, just heading out the door.
If you don't like where the software pots my comments, move them or delete them as is your privilege. I cbf playing pattycake with everybody and their talk page rules. ЯЭV⁠€⁠NΛИ† 23:28, 1 April 2011 (BST)

Responded on the page. ЯЭV⁠€⁠NΛИ† 01:39, 2 April 2011 (BST)

Just thought I'd bring it up here in response to your last post on his bid. This is at least one specific example of something that he intends to do that would be beneficial and does, in fact, require sysop powers + coding knowledge/experience. --Karek^maps?! 19:50, 2 April 2011 (BST)

Oh, and I should probably note. If that were done it would make the wiki run faster and pages able to have more content per inclusion/substitution(Template: and Subst: calls) and would lower the amount of codespame you see when editing because Templates and set sigs would, potentially, be smaller. It would make pages like Talk:Suggestions and A/VB less likely to break to the point they stop showing inclusions/templates.--Karek^maps?! 19:53, 2 April 2011 (BST)

Can we actually edit the CSS on this mediawiki? I never thought it was actually possible. I thought Kevan had to do it.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 19:58, 2 April 2011 (BST)

Sysops can, not that you guys should. It's something that can cause a lot of problems if you don't know what you're doing in regards to it and mediawiki. Rev happens to be about one of six users in the wiki's history, afaik, that knows enough about CSS and Mediawiki to do it.--Karek^maps?! 20:06, 2 April 2011 (BST)

I have poked a bit around in the Mediawiki documentation since Rev brought it up, and we can indeed: MediaWiki:Common.css However, I won't touch that page, and wouldn't recommend to fiddle with it unless you _really_ know what you are doing. -- Spiderzed█ 20:17, 2 April 2011 (BST)

I'm completely unfamiliar with this, but any idea what happens if I blank it? -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 20:23, 2 April 2011 (BST)

Every user with the default theme basically sees every page similar to the classic theme without any page formatting whatsoever. --Karek^maps?! 20:49, 2 April 2011 (BST)

Signature image

From the signature policy: "What wouldn't be allowed: * Signatures which have images higher than 14 pixels high." Get it fixed. -- Spiderzed█ 14:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Kinda was waiting for this.--Thadeous Oakley Talk 15:11, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

This is almost unusable, I think there were other ways to make it smaller but I forget how :/ --Thadeous Oakley Talk 15:12, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

It might be "unusable", but at least it is within policy. As for the wiki, it can scale images only 1:1. More fancy tricks as cutting off the tail require external programs. -- Spiderzed█ 15:19, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

looks fine on my high rez screen. get it fixed!! :P--

bitch 15:58 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Issue solved. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 16:23, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

see how easy that was... just do what we say :P--

bitch 16:26 22 March 2011 (UTC)

sysop elsewhere?

The Dutch Minecraft are in need of mods. Just to ban the troublemakers and delete the crap pages etc. and need to speak dutch. Interested? -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 04:32, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Coincidentally I looked into Minecraft a couple of weeks ago. Would have bought it if my PC could run it. (Yeah my, although severely under-clocked, laptop can't handle it's awesomeness). I got a look at the main English wiki, and my God, you'd think with such a large cult following the game they had something decent. Guess we're just that superior. I'm unaware of any language specific minecraft wiki's though. Give me a link and I'll check it out. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 13:08, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Also regarding my apparent inactivity; I'm still checking this place almost daily so I'll stay up to date, but for some reason haven't made any noteworthy contributions the past weeks. I'll see if I can do something about it, but maybe I won't, easy to make shitty promises. This place seems to be getting more "slow" too but that might be me. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 13:20, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Dw about activity here. As for minecraft, you have to go to "other languages" at the bar at the left for the dutch one. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 17:52, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Congrats

... numbnuts. A simple vandalism case about obsenity get's blown out of all proportion. You're living up to my expectations -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 10:24 14 February 2011 (BST)

Sorry, but in what way was he responsible for that?--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 10:25, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Fuck off. I thought it was open and shut, and even if I knew it wasn't I still would have brought it. If this is about your shit of "you bring up the worst in people thad" you brought on my bid then your dumb. I am not responsible for the actions other people make at all. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 10:28, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

It's not that you brought the case, because it would have been open and shut... but you just wouldn't shut your hole, and let a few people have a contrary view, and rely on the team to make their decision. It's like you want the drama to prove how bad those who don't agree with you are... seen it all before -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 10:33 14 February 2011 (BST)

Waiting for you to repost this on my talk, Misanthropy's talk and Spiderzed's talk, because we all did this. Ross and DDR too, to a degree.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 10:35, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Now we've got kneejerk policy proposals demanding that we follow the letter of the TOS... despite the fact that obsenities do get deleted as vandalism already. Think before you go screaming about minor shit like this.
You too, Yonn -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 10:37 14 February 2011 (BST)

It's called having a discussion. Also policy is again, not my responsibility. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 10:40, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Keep going, dude. It's an impressive start :D -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 10:46 14 February 2011 (BST)

Yeah man, and eight more months to go! I'm looking forward to it, hope you're too!--Thadeous Oakley Talk 10:51, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

At least we got to add an escalation to someone who likely never again would have used the wiki anyway. That sure has shown 'em, eh? -- Spiderzed█ 15:24, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism = Vandalism. At least we have our precious precedent now eh?--Thadeous Oakley Talk 16:14, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Excellent precedent. Set by your personal crusade to jump into frays even where nothing is to be gained and to extert control over the wiki even where no one asks for it, by your buddy who swiftly sneaked over to boxy to apologize for your tantrum after the first three ops went with NV, and your buddy's buddy who magically reappeared just for the VB case after three days of complete inactivity, and 7 months since the last time of having ruled on any VB case.
(And I'm not talking about boxy, DDR or Vapor here - while I disagree with their stance on that case, they presented their opinion in a mature manner and showed basic respect for their "opposition", rather than to pro-actively try to antagonize everyone who disagrees. And they actually had a reasonable chance going for them to show up on their own to look into a VB case.)
tl;dr: I'd still vote NV next time, and think I wouldn't be alone in that. -- Spiderzed█ 17:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

No, you'd have Misanthropy and Ross voting Not Vandalism as well, as their rulings showed. Oh, btw, nice co-ordination with Mis on IRC last night.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 17:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Oh God, you're being dumb. Maybe I'll take time for a bigger reply later on. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 17:10, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

You lot need to calm down, have some soothing music--^TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 17:11, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Feel free to drop by #udwiki anytime, both of you. It's a public channel that sees far too little traffic but for me, Mis and rare random visits by Aichon. (The meatpuppets are rallied on another supersecret one.) -- Spiderzed█ 22:10, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

#Redrum ?--^TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 22:34, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

I'd Appreciate Help

If you wouldn't mind, could you look over this policy here: Unbiased Group Listings and make it good. I've never done this before, and i tried to follow all the guidelines/standards. If you could look it over and add anything/clean it up/officalize it, that'd be great. Feel free to edit anything.--tyx94 20:03, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

tevs

nothing wrong with wiping a little bit of dogshit -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 10:29, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Meh, while agree it was just shitty, I don't agree with wiping; Unless blatant vandalism, I prefer moving it to the talk page. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 12:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

it doesn't have to be vandalism to wipe garbage. removing it before any damage or real irritation was made is probably the thing that would save him an escalation. not that he'd care. and there's no talk page for those votes. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 12:29, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Not that I had any problem with it being on the talk page. I just believe that "too far" is not an apt description. -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 12:30, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

I understand, I just don't mind preserving stupid yet harmless stuff like that, as long as it's off the official sections. As for historical voting, yeah I noticed that it didn't have a talk page (for a talk page) :P. There is a "general" discussion section at the bottom. Maybe move it there, or let it stay? A bit of indenting doesn't hurt the overall voting process, but I do intend to keep it tidy. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 12:36, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

I don't really care enough about it to move it, I'd prefer it to stay. Either way, in the end you'd need to carry the whole thing over to the archive after the 2 weeks anyway so you might as well let it stay? -- ϑ^anceϑ^anceℜ^evolution 12:40, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

K. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 12:51, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations

Welcome to the team.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 08:26, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Articles by Aichon, Ross and DDR. Ignore the red exclamation marks.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 08:28, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Yonn :D. I'll see into it. Definitely want to get used to all the specifics. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 08:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Now start by cycling and protecting your own bid. Promise I won't interfere this time :p -- Spiderzed█ 09:54, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Too soon. Leave it for atleast another day. Also, this is news. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 10:03, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

see told you he would change the news if he was accepted. congrats thad. i'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt. and wish you good luck. don't fuck up take a deep breath and think before you act on anything now that your voice carry's some weight.----sexualharrison ¯\()/¯ 14:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Congrats, Thad. Welcome aboard. ~ 16:49, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Bravo, Mr. Oakley. Bravo. --AXE HACK _TALK ^{Desu Nōto} _χIII ^{Everyday I'm Shufflin'!} 17:00, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Sys-Op

That's now the second time that I'm dealt as an op candidate. (The other time was Trips in this edit comment, which funnily also correctly predicted Vapor :p .)
While it is an honour to be mentioned as such (and a much better way than self-nomination as in the Dezonus case) and I've thought about it (as probably every user has at some point), I'm not sure if I'm ready.

• I've only been on the wiki for about a year, and seriously active for about 9 months.
• I don't have a particular pet project, but gnome around where the need is. In fact, I'm right now in my first bigger maintenance project as part of GSGM11.
• I still have to be an arbitot in Arbies. Although I have offered to in a couple of the imploded Doodles cases, and with the massive drop on Arbies activity, it might not be that big of a requirement anymore.

Most important point is that I'm not sure if I'd really want to be an op. Of course, routine pages as A/MR and A/SD can always use another set of hand just in case, and there's every now and then the controversial A/M or A/VB case where I think I could bring up a worthwhile opinion (as well as the more often happening blatant A/VB case that just needs someone else to chime in and confirm). But I'm not as keen on that part as you seem to be in your bid.
What I'd probably need to rise from my sofa is someone else nominating me, and a clear community opinion to actually want my grubby hands on the buttons. -- Spiderzed█ 12:57, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

9 months is long enough, about as long as Vapor and longer than Misanthropy (time spent before he got promoted). Seriously, you know the in's and out's of the wiki like any other vet. Yes, there are people who have been here for years but their all sysops (except me ;'( by now, the only thing this means is that you have less knowledge about precedence and certain drama history. This knowledge only rarely comes into practice anyway.

Like Ross said, policy is a pet in itself. I wouldn't consider it necessary anyway, if you're doing good regardless.

Arbies is handy to have on your resume, but I would forget about it. I happen to have plenty arby experience, as any party, but I come from a time where drama was much more plentiful. Nowadays real arby cases are so rare waiting for a chance could mean waiting forever.

If a nomination is all you need I know enough. I am willing to bet my editing rights you would pass with more then enough community support. Seriously. --Thadeous Oakley Talk 13:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Meh. My current policy proposal isn't vital, but will just remove a couple of mildly annoying instances of awkwardness. Plus the two actually accepted points have been brought up by others (namely Link and DDR), so it would be pretty dishonest to call it "my" pet project. All I did there was to take the incoming pass from Aichon and pass the ball further. If you want someone who actually proposes actually useful policies that are actually of his own design, nominate Vapor - his "No 20 votes" policy was really needed. (Uh, wait, he is already op now :p )

But if you still feel that the community would want me, go ahead. I'm certain there would be some who would support my bid, but I'm not so certain if that would be the opinion of the majority of the community. -- Spiderzed█ 13:56, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Nevermind, you've put me up now anyway. Would probably be better to leave any further such discussion in the plain view of the community on the Promo page. -- Spiderzed█ 14:07, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Wasn't the no 20 votes policy Link's idea?--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 08:29, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Checking back, it was indeed Link who kicked it off. Vapor was involved with nagging to wrap it up, which I seem to have mixed up. -- Spiderzed█ 15:26, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

For dealing with the district which I started but failed to continue on GSGM. :D Good luck in your bid, btw.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 23:04, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Could you...

Could you drop by the forums and hit me up with a PM, there might be a position in the Corporation opening up I imagine you'll be interested in. --Chairman Fanglord, 00:36, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Vapor

Ultimately, as you said, the crats can make their own opinions, so it doesn't matter what my reasoning is - if they don't think it's a valid reason they won't pay it any attention.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:11, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you for putting 'User:WOOT' up for vandal banning, his suggested 12-venusian-day ban is ridiculous! It would be close to 8 years! --DevilAsh  ^{|  T  |  яя  |} 23:31, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Something I don't like...

Why's does everyone call me Poodle? I like Mr. Doom. I've rather enjoyed being called Bob on that rare occassion. I even enjoyed some of the knick names DDR and Ross gave me. I never really like just "Poodle". I'd prefer the abbreviation of the screen name better.... -Estacado^Talk 17:51, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Pointless Job?

Helpful editting job if you want it. Here and Here --Ross^lessness 14:02, 17 August 2010 (BST)

Not for a week, but its a good way to flex those admin muscles. --Ross^lessness 14:22, 17 August 2010 (BST)

Nice job on the Arbies cases. Kudos.--Yonnua Koponen^{Politics, the Burnham Way!} 22:53, 17 August 2010 (BST)

Nah, I won't finish, I'm heading to bed myself in an hour, but I have a timeline of Russian history to do first. This can take place over a week or two. It's been that way for 5 years, it can wait a few days. You lure ross to the shanty town, I'll finish the job. Also, header was intentional.--Yonnua Koponen^{Politics, the Burnham Way!} 23:01, 17 August 2010 (BST)

Epic

Welcome to the Discosaurs! You going to be Manhunting with us in the EVIL Manhunt?--Yonnua Koponen^{Politics, the Burnham Way!} 23:31, 9 August 2010 (BST)

Pff, no. Not even vaguely. I just need to know who's going to be in on our manhunt team or not. I'm assuming this group will be mainly schenanigans based, with the goal of becoming UDs top group.--Yonnua Koponen^{Politics, the Burnham Way!} 23:37, 9 August 2010 (BST)

yeah, doesn't it work for you?--Yonnua Koponen^{Politics, the Burnham Way!} 11:54, 10 August 2010 (BST)

Hey,...

I believe you were one of the many people who've filed complaints about the crued look of our wiki page. What do you think now huh? Come on, give it to me!!! -_∞ Poodle of Doom _∞ 01:59, 9 August 2010 (BST)

Your Promotion Bid

Tough luck. :( You should get in next time though. Just follow the advice of the crats, and keep rackign up those positive edits! --Yonnua Koponen^{Politics, the Burnham Way!} 23:51, 5 August 2010 (BST)

Cough cough!

I just thought you never noticed my reply here, especially with 2 slots available and all... ;) --AXE HACK _TALK ^{Desu Nōto} _χIII ^{Everyday I'm Shufflin'!} 12:14, 23 July 2010 (BST)

Just to let you know, you ad has expired. We hope to do business with you again. --AXE HACK _TALK ^{Desu Nōto} _χIII ^{Everyday I'm Shufflin'!} 15:21, 31 July 2010 (BST)

First

Like it says. New page is very minimalist. ◐◑ﷲ 20:55, 12 July 2010 (BST)

I like it. It looks pleasing to the eye.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 20:55, 12 July 2010 (BST)

Your edit conflicting me on my own page, GAH! --Thadeous Oakley 20:57, 12 July 2010 (BST)

Should have known someone would come, but I'm still busy D:< --Thadeous Oakley 20:56, 12 July 2010 (BST)

I'm just here only because MisterGame himself directed me to his own talk page. =P --AXE HACK _TALK ^{Desu Nōto} _χIII ^{Everyday I'm Shufflin'!} 00:35, 18 July 2010 (BST)

Get out of bed!

[makes furnace noises through snuffle] f-f-f-f-f [pokes Mr. Game with snuffle, Mr. Game jumps out of bed] It's very important that you get out of bed! I'm Arnold Schnuffleupanegger, and you must get breakfast! It's very important that you eat breakfast! --Schnuffleupanegger 04:06, 12 September 2010 (BST)

I Lol'd

That is all --Ross^lessness 22:37, 3 October 2010 (BST)

...=

Whatever you do, it's always gonna be in the same place...And stay like that until the section gains length... --AXE HACK _TALK ^{Desu Nōto} _χIII ^{Everyday I'm Shufflin'!} 20:05, 6 October 2010 (BST)

Questions

Greetings Thadeous Oakley

Since you seem to be the most active member of The Umbrella Corporation in Malton, I wanted to ask you about your coverage in Ruddlebank. Is The Umbrella Corporation still monitoring that suburb or have they moved on? I wanted to know because I am interested in acquiring the Holmes Arms building. Of course, if The Umbrella Corporation is still in charge of those buildings, I would like to know. The last thing that I want to do is be accused of a hostile takeover.

Safe travels Derek Sutherland --TheBardofAwesome 20:21, 7 October 2010 (BST)

I apprieciate you ask first. To be honest, we're not currently active in Ruddlebank, and I doubt this will change soon. As such, feel free to claim it. --Thadeous Oakley 09:48, 8 October 2010 (BST)

Ah, alright. Thank you. If the revered and honorable Umbrella Corporation feels the need to return, by all means do so. A warm bed, a hot meal, and a frosty drink will be waiting for all of you. --TheBardofAwesome 14:31, 8 October 2010 (BST)

Manhunt

Why are you (masquerading as Grim s) following the manhunt and attempting to kill me? :( --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:38, 7 October 2010 (BST)

He's not masquerading as Grim, his name is just Thadeus Oakley backwards. He splatted me earlier. :/ ◐◑ﷲ 22:19, 7 October 2010 (BST)

Check the real name field.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:21, 7 October 2010 (BST)

You got me. But don't think it ends here. I'm hunting you all down >:) --Thadeous Oakley 22:26, 7 October 2010 (BST)

You didn't get me. :P Plus, what your doing makes me think you'll like what I have lined up for the first Discosaurs group activity once the manhunt ends. :D --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:27, 7 October 2010 (BST)

O rlly? What are you doing then? --Thadeous Oakley 22:30, 7 October 2010 (BST)

All shall be revealed at the time. --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:32, 7 October 2010 (BST)

A/PM

I've nominated you for promotion. Good luck.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 14:31, 13 October 2010 (BST)

Discosaurs

Still interested in Schenanigans and such? If so, we have a forum now, so sign up. :D --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:43, 17 October 2010 (BST)

---

Do not reply at the bottom, new posts go at the top