User talk:DanceDanceRevolution/status: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
The Rooster (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::Still, once you get this onto 1000 pages, the constant status updates may cause a bit of groanage <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 01:51 13 April 2009 (BST)</small> | ::Still, once you get this onto 1000 pages, the constant status updates may cause a bit of groanage <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 01:51 13 April 2009 (BST)</small> | ||
:::The thing is, you might be right, but I used the hypothesis about the templated ''noinclude'' information and I templated the statuses, the code and everything. Basically, every aspect of this system is templated, so, lets say, editing the 'superfluous information' template twice a day should have the exact same affect as editing my status twice a day. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}}{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/status}} 13:44, 17 April 2009 (BST) | :::The thing is, you might be right, but I used the hypothesis about the templated ''noinclude'' information and I templated the statuses, the code and everything. Basically, every aspect of this system is templated, so, lets say, editing the 'superfluous information' template twice a day should have the exact same affect as editing my status twice a day. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}}{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/status}} 13:44, 17 April 2009 (BST) | ||
::::Well, no. When you update the superfluous text, that only triggers one update since it's only included on this page (and the noinclude tags prevent it spreading further). When you update the status, that triggers lots of updates since that ''is'' included lots of times on lots of pages. The software then has to update all of those pages. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 15:28, 17 April 2009 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 14:28, 17 April 2009
| Damn them sigs |
| This user doesn't like sig templates and prefers an oldschool non-templated sig (and contributes to reducing server load by using one). |
Not only is there a shitload of superfluous text on the template page (that, while noincluded, is still called on every time this is used on a page), it is designed to be regularly updated (whenever you go on/off-line), meaning extra server work whenever this happens -- boxy talk • teh rulz 13:46 12 April 2009 (BST)
- I briefly read a recent administration protection case similar to that, and I gathered that it was healthy for the server if the superfluous information was put on the page via a template. Was I wrong? I only skimmed through the case. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) OFFLINE 14:43, 12 April 2009 (BST)
- Since it's templated, you can have all the superfluous text you like, won't make a dent. --
RoosterDragon 
14:49, 12 April 2009 (BST)
- I must have missed that one. Neat trick if it works!
- Still, once you get this onto 1000 pages, the constant status updates may cause a bit of groanage -- boxy talk • teh rulz 01:51 13 April 2009 (BST)
- The thing is, you might be right, but I used the hypothesis about the templated noinclude information and I templated the statuses, the code and everything. Basically, every aspect of this system is templated, so, lets say, editing the 'superfluous information' template twice a day should have the exact same affect as editing my status twice a day. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) OFFLINE 13:44, 17 April 2009 (BST)
- Well, no. When you update the superfluous text, that only triggers one update since it's only included on this page (and the noinclude tags prevent it spreading further). When you update the status, that triggers lots of updates since that is included lots of times on lots of pages. The software then has to update all of those pages. -- RoosterDragon 15:28, 17 April 2009 (BST)
- Well, no. When you update the superfluous text, that only triggers one update since it's only included on this page (and the noinclude tags prevent it spreading further). When you update the status, that triggers lots of updates since that is included lots of times on lots of pages. The software then has to update all of those pages. --
- The thing is, you might be right, but I used the hypothesis about the templated noinclude information and I templated the statuses, the code and everything. Basically, every aspect of this system is templated, so, lets say, editing the 'superfluous information' template twice a day should have the exact same affect as editing my status twice a day. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) OFFLINE 13:44, 17 April 2009 (BST)
- Since it's templated, you can have all the superfluous text you like, won't make a dent. --
