User talk:Revenant: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→A/RE: Short answer: Didn't want to run for bureaucrat again, but there's still stuff I want to get done as a sysop…) |
CrunchyCake (talk | contribs) (→REV: new section) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Just wondered if you were interested in keeping the buttons? Last election kind of gave the impression you wouldn't run again. --[[User:Rosslessness|Ross<sup>less</sup>ness]] 16:56, 23 January 2012 (UTC) | Just wondered if you were interested in keeping the buttons? Last election kind of gave the impression you wouldn't run again. --[[User:Rosslessness|Ross<sup>less</sup>ness]] 16:56, 23 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
:'''Short answer:''' Didn't want to run for bureaucrat again, but there's still stuff I want to get done as a sysop.<br/> '''Long answer:''' My philosophy regarding admin staff (on various sites) has generally been that as long as they're still contributing and still in touch with the community, they're worth retaining. <br/> Once someone genuinely leaves, they're unlikely to come back and just as unlikely to be suitable to immediately take up an admin role again, should they return. (This is what I see the actual use of inactive sysop policies as being.)<br/> Of course, there are other philosophies, but I would hope that I fit the former category more than the latter.<br/> I trust you and Boxy to use your best judgement. {{smile}} {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 01:38, 24 January 2012 (UTC) | :'''Short answer:''' Didn't want to run for bureaucrat again, but there's still stuff I want to get done as a sysop.<br/> '''Long answer:''' My philosophy regarding admin staff (on various sites) has generally been that as long as they're still contributing and still in touch with the community, they're worth retaining. <br/> Once someone genuinely leaves, they're unlikely to come back and just as unlikely to be suitable to immediately take up an admin role again, should they return. (This is what I see the actual use of inactive sysop policies as being.)<br/> Of course, there are other philosophies, but I would hope that I fit the former category more than the latter.<br/> I trust you and Boxy to use your best judgement. {{smile}} {{User:Revenant/Sig}} 01:38, 24 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
== REV == | |||
You wouldn't happen to have Yama's Facebook details would you? I want to poke him into rejoining. Also, YOU HAVE TO COME, 7997. {{User:CrunchyCake/Sig}} 05:01, 23 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:01, 23 March 2012
 |
Things Best Forgotten |
| This User talk page has an Archive |
Beep
A/RE
Sup, Rev? FYI you're up for A/RE. I plopped a question down if you don't mind taking a looky-look. Take care. ~
14:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, I noticed.
Thanks for the questions: replied on the re-evaluation page. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 01:08, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
A/RE
Just wondered if you were interested in keeping the buttons? Last election kind of gave the impression you wouldn't run again. --Rosslessness 16:56, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
- Short answer: Didn't want to run for bureaucrat again, but there's still stuff I want to get done as a sysop.
Long answer: My philosophy regarding admin staff (on various sites) has generally been that as long as they're still contributing and still in touch with the community, they're worth retaining.
Once someone genuinely leaves, they're unlikely to come back and just as unlikely to be suitable to immediately take up an admin role again, should they return. (This is what I see the actual use of inactive sysop policies as being.)
Of course, there are other philosophies, but I would hope that I fit the former category more than the latter.
I trust you and Boxy to use your best judgement. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 01:38, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
REV
You wouldn't happen to have Yama's Facebook details would you? I want to poke him into rejoining. Also, YOU HAVE TO COME, 7997. CrunchyCake T Breakfast Club 05:01, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
