UDWiki talk:Administration/Policy Discussion/For God So Loved Amazing

From The Urban Dead Wiki
< UDWiki talk:Administration‎ | Policy Discussion
Revision as of 20:16, 13 October 2006 by The General (talk | contribs) (→‎Not Worth It)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

King

Burgerking 150.jpg ALL HAIL KING AMAZING!
This user or group recognizes Amazing as King.
declaring Amazing king is outside of the bounds of this policy, sorry Gage. -- Rueful 14:37, 12 October 2006 (BST)
I am well aware, I just thought it would be funny.--Gage 15:05, 12 October 2006 (BST)

Seriously?

I would take Amazing back even if you weren't permabanned. That just makes the deal sweeter XD.--Gage 01:18, 11 October 2006 (BST)

Humorous PD. It made me laugh.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 01:27, 11 October 2006 (BST)
Just as I would never make a humorous suggestion(or any suggestion for that matter), this policy is serious and I hope it passes -- Rueful 01:34, 11 October 2006 (BST)
In 3 days will you put your money where your mouth is?--Gage 01:40, 11 October 2006 (BST)
I was under the impression that the voting and ratification took 2 weeks or so each, what's 3 days have to do with anything? If the mods gimp this through without the community, people will complain. -- Rueful 01:49, 11 October 2006 (BST)
You have to wait 3 days before you put it up to vote. --Gage 02:13, 11 October 2006 (BST)
I see. -- Rueful 02:50, 11 October 2006 (BST)
This will have my vote, come time. --CaptainM 04:49, 11 October 2006 (BST)

Not Worth It

Now, I don't really know who you are, but I don't think it's worth it. I believe (don't quote me on this) that Amazing has said that he wouldn't come back even if he were unbanned. --♥UpsettingNot a Moderator 03:51, 11 October 2006 (BST)

Rueful created GANKBUS, a group created just to fuck with Amazing till he got himself banned. What he (Rueful) did was just as bad or worse than what Amazing did.--Gage 03:53, 11 October 2006 (BST)
No, he'll just continue lurking so intensely that any minor change to the format of the UDWiki is reflected on the Scroll Wars wiki within a day. Riiiight. -- Alan Watson T·RPM 04:00, 11 October 2006 (BST)
Well, SW was using the latest MediaWiki version before Kevan got off his ass to update UD. But yeah, I hear Amazing is going to steal the 'broken offsite images' feature next. --Zod Rhombus 05:30, 12 October 2006 (BST)
I'm sure you were trying to do me a favor but please preserve my indentation level. I was replying to Upsetting specifically in this case. And to clarify I was referring not to wiki code upgrades but the creation of unique pages like Demotion. Not to mention most of the Moderator pages were lifted line for line anyways. -- Alan Watson T·RPM 14:13, 12 October 2006 (BST)
Look at the history on the SW wiki for the Demotions page, as you can see the General copied it so you can't very well say that Amazing lifting the pages. Infact the General has the first edit on all of the moderation pages. Anyway the demotions page was my creation and I'm letting it be used over there, just the same as the policy on appropriate signatures was created on the SW wiki by me and is now being voted upon over here. I honestly can't see any evidence that Amazing is lurking on UD wiki, but then again I can't prove it the other way. Oh well, you get that. - Jedaz - 18:13/3/06/2024 01:18, 13 October 2006 (BST)
Minus the spelling mistakes and you're about right. If Odd Starter wants to come back and sue me for breach of copyright then he's welcome to waste his money.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 21:16, 13 October 2006 (BST)