Talk:The Dead 2.0: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
::As far as the listing for DHPD, they have been confirmed for Dunell Hills for reasons which I will explain.  They way we seek confirmation is to contact any groups that are listed in a suburb (just as I've done with you), and take them on their word that they are active if they respond within the given time-frame.  While this method may not result in complete truthfulness, it is the least controversial method that can be applied within a reasonable measure of manpower and impartiality.<br>
::As far as the listing for DHPD, they have been confirmed for Dunell Hills for reasons which I will explain.  They way we seek confirmation is to contact any groups that are listed in a suburb (just as I've done with you), and take them on their word that they are active if they respond within the given time-frame.  While this method may not result in complete truthfulness, it is the least controversial method that can be applied within a reasonable measure of manpower and impartiality.<br>
::In theory we could garner more accurate data by creating accounts in all the suburbs in question and then monitoring the suburbs for a month or so to see if the groups are truly active, however this would be extremely time-consuming.  Rather than get into disputes over who is active where, we've decided to just stick with this method for now, at least until something better can be devised.  I hope you find my explanation to be adequate, and thank you again for your response.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 18:57, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
::In theory we could garner more accurate data by creating accounts in all the suburbs in question and then monitoring the suburbs for a month or so to see if the groups are truly active, however this would be extremely time-consuming.  Rather than get into disputes over who is active where, we've decided to just stick with this method for now, at least until something better can be devised.  I hope you find my explanation to be adequate, and thank you again for your response.--{{User:Giles Sednik/sig}} 18:57, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
:::Oh if it's just the ''trust system'' then we are active in every suburb in the city, why not. --{{User:Katthew/Sig}} 10:53, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:53, 11 February 2011

Great Suburb Group Massacre 2011

Check-Mark-Reviewed.jpg Group Confirmed.
This group was confirmed active. Thank you for your reply.

Hi there, if you can list the specific suburbs in which your group is active that would be very helpful. Thanks!--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 13:41, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Pretty much Peddlesden Village, Chudleyton, Dunell Hills, West Becktown, Owsleybank and Molebank. You can tell by all the DHPD chumps we leave rotting in the streets, typically after their latest attempt to "reclaim" Dunell Hills from our tenacious and permanent grasp. Also if this wiki has any semblance of truthfulness to it, you won't put Dunell Hills down as a suburb that the DHPD is active in - because they're not. They come in for five minutes, repair a building or two, and then we kill them all and they run off to try again a week or two later. --カシュー, ザ ゾンビ クィーン (ビープ ビープ) ;x You rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild! @ 23:21, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply. I've updated your status in Dunell Hills as confirmed. Of the suburbs that you mentioned, you were only listed on the wiki under Dunell Hills. If you want to add yourself to the suburb group listings for the other suburbs feel free to do so. The job we are doing is to confirm which groups are still active and remove the ones that aren't. So we aren't currently adding listings ourselves, but as I mentioned you are perfectly within your rights to do so yourself.
As far as the listing for DHPD, they have been confirmed for Dunell Hills for reasons which I will explain. They way we seek confirmation is to contact any groups that are listed in a suburb (just as I've done with you), and take them on their word that they are active if they respond within the given time-frame. While this method may not result in complete truthfulness, it is the least controversial method that can be applied within a reasonable measure of manpower and impartiality.
In theory we could garner more accurate data by creating accounts in all the suburbs in question and then monitoring the suburbs for a month or so to see if the groups are truly active, however this would be extremely time-consuming. Rather than get into disputes over who is active where, we've decided to just stick with this method for now, at least until something better can be devised. I hope you find my explanation to be adequate, and thank you again for your response.--GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 18:57, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Oh if it's just the trust system then we are active in every suburb in the city, why not. --カシュー, ザ ゾンビ クィーン (ビープ ビープ) ;x You rated this wiki '1'! Great job, go hog wild! @ 10:53, 11 February 2011 (UTC)