Talk:Woodroffe Mall: Difference between revisions
Greenwarrior (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(→broken?: fixed) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
the danger report looks broken? | the danger report looks broken? | ||
--[[User:Greenwarrior|Greenwarrior]] 08:47, 7 January 2011 (UTC) | --[[User:Greenwarrior|Greenwarrior]] 08:47, 7 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Fixed. The template was broken by a missing square bracket. {{User:Chief Seagull/Sig}} 09:30, 7 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:30, 7 January 2011
The statement 'The mall and its perimeter have been secured by the Paradox group several weeks ago.' needs to be altered to be relative to a given date. It was several weeks ago from when? Today? Last year? --McGrude 07:36, 12 Oct 2005 (BST)
Entry Points
most of buildings arround Mall are overbarricated, what makes a big problem to climb in after you've leaved (to revive a fallen soldier for example). and there is no optimal defense plan for this suburb... We need to decide what buildings should be entry points. the Wakley Building [62, 64] seems proper to me. also it might be any of the fire stations... --Duke Garland 16:20, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Someone needs to fix the main article.
I don't know why the map danger levels are showing, but they shouldn't be, and I honestly don't know how to fix it.--Insomniac By Choice 19:09, 27 August 2007 (BST)
broken?
the danger report looks broken? --Greenwarrior 08:47, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- Fixed. The template was broken by a missing square bracket. ~~ Chief Seagull ~~ talk 09:30, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
