Talk:Z.A.L.P.: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
(You suck)
Line 15: Line 15:
On behalf of Skynet Defense Network, I'd like to welcome you.  Your ideas are fresh and ingenious; we would very much be interested in supporting your cause and learning from  
On behalf of Skynet Defense Network, I'd like to welcome you.  Your ideas are fresh and ingenious; we would very much be interested in supporting your cause and learning from  
you.  --{{User:Bad Attitude Barbie/sig}} 19:59, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
you.  --{{User:Bad Attitude Barbie/sig}} 19:59, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
== You suck ==
This group is the gayest thing since gay came to gaytown. {{Life Cultist}} {{User:Zombie Lord/sig2}} <tt>06:28 17 December 2010(UTC)</tt>

Revision as of 06:28, 17 December 2010

Template:Wyke Hills Groups

You're not zombies who fight for survivors, you're survivors who happen to be undead. Intention is more important that heart-rate. Therefore, I'd like to move you to 'Survivor Groups'. --VVV RPGMBCWS 21:07, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

This group is still forming but its leader and a few of its first few members "suffer" from brainrot. They will be full time zombies who will not seek revives. Other members like the people in my group may pop into this group on occasion but there is a core group, and excepting occasional experimentation with a heartbeat, they will always be zombies working with survivors. I think catagorizing it as a survivor group would be less accurate; it is non-traditional, but I believe it still qualifies as a zombie group. In this case, it is more about biology than ideology. I will mention to betty that she may want to be more clear on this point on the wiki.
--Albert Schwan Albert Schwan  21:14, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Albert is correct. I plan on having a core group of permanent zombies. The wiki was merely highlighting our desire to have membership sharing with other groups if they wished, which I thought needed to be explained. I will correct the wiki when I get a few minutes to dedicate to it. Please let me know if you still think this should be a survivor group. I don't feel it should because all members will be zombies when wearing the group tag, but I would be open to hearing your points. ~BedlamBetty

Breadth of Life-Culting

As the leader of Malton's leading and most numerous life-cultist group Herbie Goes Bananas, I wish to hear Z.A.L.P.'s POV on using life-cultists for maintaining entry points and increasing safehouse security by making them seem harmanbargar-free. The activities you suggest don't seem to include them. -- Spiderzed 21:22, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

While your commitment to ensuring the "safety" of survivors by de-barricading and ruining buildings and encouraging local zombies to eat them is "admirable", it does not actually constitute life-culting; nor does simply ZKing. True, a dead harman is safer than a live one in Malton, but if they are dead, it is no longer life culting. Your strategy even fails to serve the needs of PKers or Death-Cultists (an act which could technically be called life-culting). Remember, more people=more targets and better barricades=better piñatas. You may further consider that ruining auto repair shops may not be in the best interest of your membership. Let’s face it; you VWs can be a little less than reliable sometimes. I dare say Z.A.L.P.’s approach is rather different from yours: it is designed as a strategy that works, rather than a banana tactic.
--Albert Schwan Albert Schwan  22:16, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Welcome

On behalf of Skynet Defense Network, I'd like to welcome you. Your ideas are fresh and ingenious; we would very much be interested in supporting your cause and learning from you. --Bad Attitude BarbieSDN 19:59, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

You suck

This group is the gayest thing since gay came to gaytown.

Lame.jpg Terrible Role Playing
Life Cultists are terrible RPers. Zombies are never, ever helpful to the living.

--

| T | BALLS! | 06:28 17 December 2010(UTC)