UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Iscariot and The Order of Philosophe Knights vs Sarah Aline and The Upper Left Corner
Iscariot and The Order of Philosophe Knights versus Sarah Aline and The Upper Left Corner
This case is being brought over the location page for Southall Mansion. There is a dispute to the content of that page. The Order of Philosophe Knights have attempted to establish a consensus for the page and enter into dialogue to resolve the dispute. The Order has been ignored by the Upper Left Corner and its addition either summarily reverted or altered into a derogatory format.
Given the history of automatic reversions by the ULC and the lack of response to our attempts to amicably resolve the situation, the Order has decided to pursue arbitration in order to prevent the inevitable edit war and disruption to the community.
I am the Order's designated representative in this matter.
The Order will await the initial ULC response before beginning the arbitrator selection process, however given past dealings, the Order will not accept any member of the Administration team. -- 
.
. <== DDR Approved Editor 21:43, 27 August 2008 (BST)
- As the Upper Left Corner seem to show no interest in debating this in any form and thus ensuring harmony on this wiki, I have rendered the page in question as a basic entry, removing all content that caused arguments.
- I will leave this case open if ULC decide to respond. --
.
. <== DDR Approved Editor 17:38, 4 September 2008 (BST)
- Thank you for the offer Ashley, but looking through your edit history I cannot see enough edits to procedural pages to entrust this case to you. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 10:50, 25 September 2008 (BST)
- Thank you for the offer Ashley, but looking through your edit history I cannot see enough edits to procedural pages to entrust this case to you. --
The edit history clearly shows that ULC is aware of this case, it must be assumed then that they are deliberately ignoring wiki procedure and attempting to force an edit war. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 10:50, 25 September 2008 (BST)
Ok, I'm here. What exactly do you want? The "drama" causing bit has been removed, and I've reworded a section of the page so it sounds nice... Note that there is NO drama in it. Yet you people continue to change it for NO reason. Stop trying to cause drama. Also, I approve of Ash being the arbitrator. Your condescending attitude is not appreciated, Iscariot. -S Aline 05:03, 26 September 2008 (BST)
The next stage is to select an arbitrator. I reject Ash for the reasons already given. The Order will accept Gus Thomas or J3D. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 07:25, 26 September 2008 (BST)
- Seems fairly straight fwd, i'll do it if Sarah is fully willing to participate as it seems that she's been reluctant to come to arbies about the issue, so sarah if you aren't - don't choose me as the arby-er please. --xoxo 07:41, 26 September 2008 (BST)
- I honestly don't see the point in an arbitration since the part under discussion has been removed from the page, but J3D is fine by me. -S Aline 14:31, 26 September 2008 (BST)
Iscariot, a confirmation please then i'll fire this baby up.--xoxo 15:12, 26 September 2008 (BST)
- By all means J3D, go ahead. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 16:36, 26 September 2008 (BST)
