UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Off-Site Requests for Admin Actions: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→For) |
|||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
#I still don't really like the part about temporarily tolerating other off-site requests but I don't suppose it can be too badly abused. It's probably just me and its no reason to shoot it down. Overall the policy is good and definitely one that is needed. ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>15:15, 30 May 2011 (UTC)</sub> | #I still don't really like the part about temporarily tolerating other off-site requests but I don't suppose it can be too badly abused. It's probably just me and its no reason to shoot it down. Overall the policy is good and definitely one that is needed. ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>15:15, 30 May 2011 (UTC)</sub> | ||
#Sounds reasonable.--<span>[[User:The General|The General]] <sup>[[User Talk:The General|T]] [[Special:ListUsers/sysop|<span title="System Operator">Sys</span>]] [[Project_UnWelcome|<span title="Project UnWelcome">U!</span>]] [[Project Wiki Patrol|<span title="Project Wiki Patrol">P!</span>]] <span class="plainlinks">[http://urbandeadwiki.smfforfree.com/index.php <span title="Urban Dead Wiki Forum">F!</span>]</span></sup></span> 16:23, 30 May 2011 (BST) | #Sounds reasonable.--<span>[[User:The General|The General]] <sup>[[User Talk:The General|T]] [[Special:ListUsers/sysop|<span title="System Operator">Sys</span>]] [[Project_UnWelcome|<span title="Project UnWelcome">U!</span>]] [[Project Wiki Patrol|<span title="Project Wiki Patrol">P!</span>]] <span class="plainlinks">[http://urbandeadwiki.smfforfree.com/index.php <span title="Urban Dead Wiki Forum">F!</span>]</span></sup></span> 16:23, 30 May 2011 (BST) | ||
#The part about being able to overturn the request is absolutely necessary, since we would otherwise be giving these off-site requests the same weight as on-site requests, but without the requirement that any sort of paper trail be provided. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 16:52, 30 May 2011 (BST) | |||
===Against=== | ===Against=== |
Revision as of 15:52, 30 May 2011
In general, off-site requests relayed to administrative pages don't need to be carried out, with a few exceptions:
- Actions requested on behalf of a banned user (especially for, but not necessarily limited to Permaban appeals).
- Actions that would have been considered to be scheduled anyway (particularly, but not limited to Scheduled Deletions and Scheduled Protections).
Sys-Ops may temporarily tolerate other off-site requests. As such a request is merely tolerated, a sys-op may anytime ask for another sys-op to overturn it, unless the user himself shows up on-site to confirm it.
The following actions are absolutely never eligible for off-site requests, but must always be asked for on-site:
- Votes
- Self-requested bans
- Self-requested demotions
Voting Section
Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a sysop. |
The only valid voting sections are For and Against. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
For
- -- Spiderzed█ 15:10, 30 May 2011 (BST)
- --User:Sexualharrison15:11, 30 May 2011 (bst)
- --TCAPD(╯°□°)╯ ┻━┻ 15:12, 30 May 2011 (BST)
- I still don't really like the part about temporarily tolerating other off-site requests but I don't suppose it can be too badly abused. It's probably just me and its no reason to shoot it down. Overall the policy is good and definitely one that is needed. ~ 15:15, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- Sounds reasonable.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 16:23, 30 May 2011 (BST)
- The part about being able to overturn the request is absolutely necessary, since we would otherwise be giving these off-site requests the same weight as on-site requests, but without the requirement that any sort of paper trail be provided. —Aichon— 16:52, 30 May 2011 (BST)
Against
- -If it's even remotely worthwhile, it's worth taking the 10 seconds to log in and sign. If it isn't, then don't bother requesting it. --Karloth Vois ¯\(°_o)/¯ 15:24, 30 May 2011 (BST)
- how about if they are banned?--User:Sexualharrison15:34, 30 May 2011 (bst)
- Why would anyone vote for this? It had potential right up until the author intentionally made it so on a whim any sysop can step in and undo the request. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 16:23, 30 May 2011 (BST)
- Sounds flaky to me. --Akbar 16:27, 30 May 2011 (BST)