UDWiki:Administration/Promotions: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Cyberbob240 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*'''Vouch''' - Look. 3 vouches. Now he has to accept. Although he might not. Did I mention '''Vouch'''? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 01:46, 31 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Vouch''' - Look. 3 vouches. Now he has to accept. Although he might not. Did I mention '''Vouch'''? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 01:46, 31 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
*'''Against''' - We do not need yet another rules-whoring crybaby on the sysop team. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 01:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Against''' - We do not need yet another rules-whoring crybaby on the sysop team. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 01:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
*'''Strongly Against''' This user has shown time and time again that he fails to comprehend basic concepts. His arguments are emotional, weak (at best), nonsensical and off topic. I seriously wonder if someone hacked Karek's account to make him do this. --{{User:Nubis/sig}} 02:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Candidates currently under community discussion== | ==Candidates currently under community discussion== | ||
Revision as of 02:10, 31 January 2009
Template:Moderationnav Template:Promotions Intro
Candidates still requiring vouches
Place all new promotion bids under this header
User:Honestmistake
He has more than enough contributions, although the history purge screws with the contributor history. He has been here more than a year now, has taken an active interest in the maintenance duties and policy discussions on this wiki and, while we don't always agree is the kind of user I think should be promoted. He has proven he is able to do the job and more than qualifies. So, assuming he accepts, I think it's about time we gave him a bid.--Karekmaps?! 01:32, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- Vouch - I put him up here, it would be strange if I didn't vouch. I believe he would be a good Sysop. --Karekmaps?! 01:32, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- Vouch - I've known him on the suggestion pages for a while. He's a good guy, doesn't get involved in too much drama and is reasonably level-headed. Not sure if he wants this, though. Linkthewindow Talk 01:36, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- Against - too fucking serious too much of the time.--CyberRead240 01:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- Vouch - Look. 3 vouches. Now he has to accept. Although he might not. Did I mention Vouch? --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 01:46, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- Against - We do not need yet another rules-whoring crybaby on the sysop team. --Cyberbob 01:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- Strongly Against This user has shown time and time again that he fails to comprehend basic concepts. His arguments are emotional, weak (at best), nonsensical and off topic. I seriously wonder if someone hacked Karek's account to make him do this. --– Nubis NWO 02:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
