UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2011 05

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions.

Template:M/SD Intro


Speedy Deletion Queue

http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/City_hall

no info on page - misspelled title could not edit

Mayor MC Cheese 14:29, 7 May 2011 (BST)

Iscariot

User:Iscariot

  1. Author Edit Only: The page has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author, and has been edited only by its author. Note that edits by adbots or vandals and reverts caused by them do not count.
  2. User Page: The page is a User subpage that has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author.

Speedy Deletion Eligibility

Send 'er down, Huey. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 17:33, 4 May 2011 (BST)

Keep So wait, since it didn't seem you were getting your way in the discussion you're just gonna try to force it down here? Nice. (Fails crit 7 and 8 since NOT requested by original author here)-- Cat Pic.png Thadeous Oakley Talk 18:54, 4 May 2011 (BST)

It's called following procedure, something I don't expect you to understand. Anyways, turns out this was a mistake stemming from a misunderstanding, so Retracted. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 19:10, 4 May 2011 (BST)
Also, please note the exact wording: “…has been requested for speedy deletion by the original author.” No mention of where, which IMO is as it should be. (And no, I do not expect this to be abused, for the simple reason that the original author can come back and prove the request false should they not have made the request.) ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 19:16, 4 May 2011 (BST)

User:Iscariot/Signature

I think you're barking up the wrong histories, when I left I don't remember asking for Ross et al to delete my user page, although it may have escaped my memory. What I did want deleting was User: Iscariot/Signature, which was done and then stupidly overridden by certain people trying to take a shot at me after I'd left.

—Iscariot

Same reason as the above, right page this time. Should be Scheduled (Crit 7 by proxy), but playing this by the book. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 19:10, 4 May 2011 (BST)

Keep, because this would be bound to leave improper sigs calling a non-existent page all over the place. What could be done is to replace the code on the page with a plain userpage link, which would both get rid of the original sig and leave the pages it appears on in order. -- Spiderzed 19:26, 4 May 2011 (BST)

Per precedent, a redlink is fine too; but OK, move this to A/D and prolong this whole pointless debate, if you want. Tongue :P ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 19:33, 4 May 2011 (BST)
The issue is that it would leave a redlink to User:Iscariot/Signature, not to User:Iscariot. The latter would be fine, the former would be problematic. -- Spiderzed 19:37, 4 May 2011 (BST)
Userspace has subpages enabled, so that page will link back to his userpage. Nor pretty, but completely unambiguous. That said, if you want to go ahead and replace them, be my guest. Happy ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 19:41, 4 May 2011 (BST)
Spidey, crit 7 over-rides keep votes (same applies to thad above). Rev, was this an email request? if so, can you get a screenshot, or get him to email me? Sorry, but since there's been so much arguing, I feel a nice email screencap would resolve it. If you post one, I'll delete it as soon as I can.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 20:19, 4 May 2011 (BST)
If you doubt me, email him for confirmation yourself. Posting quotes is one thing; posting entire correspondence without permission is another entirely. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 20:51, 4 May 2011 (BST)
Will do. I don't doubt you, it would just be weird for me to do a deletion without talking to him myself.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 20:56, 4 May 2011 (BST)
Sorry, I can't, because his email isn't registered on the system.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 21:01, 4 May 2011 (BST)

Served Speedy Deletions

UDWiki:Administration/Protections

  • 17:41, 4 May 2011 Revenant (Talk | contribs | block) restored "UDWiki:Administration/Protections" ‎ (1,874 revisions restored: Thank fuck I use edit summaries. OK then. Let's hope *this* works.)
  • 17:38, 4 May 2011 Revenant (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "UDWiki:Administration/Protections" ‎ (Personal Information: Balls. Doesn't work like Oversight. Fixing.) (view/restore)
  • 17:35, 4 May 2011 Revenant (Talk | contribs | block) restored "UDWiki:Administration/Protections" ‎ (1,889 revisions restored: And that should be that. Restoring.)
  • 17:30, 4 May 2011 Revenant (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "UDWiki:Administration/Protections" ‎ (Personal Information: Requested by User:Iscariot – as we have no Oversight, have to delete and then restore.)

ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 18:48, 4 May 2011 (BST)


What exactly were you doing there? Removing the link to Iscariot's blog and first name that you provided? How come all of a sudden? Did Iscariot ask you to remove them after you placed it? -- Cat Pic.png Thadeous Oakley

Exactly that. Personal Information is a scheduled deletion. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 19:21, 4 May 2011 (BST)
I know it's an instant speedy, but I wanted to know if Izzy asked you to remove it. -- Cat Pic.png Thadeous Oakley Talk 19:23, 4 May 2011 (BST)
Did you have to do that? Not only has it artificially jacked the stats of one pointless post, but it's also pointed a whole load of people I didn't want to associate with directly to me. Quoting right to disappear from Wikipedia is all well and good, but I'd actually managed to disappear until you drew them a map.

—Iscariot

Does that satisfy you? ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 19:29, 4 May 2011 (BST)
The gravity of unwanted shared personal information strongly outweighs the need to follow minor procedure rules. Rev made the right judgement call in this case. -- Spiderzed 19:35, 4 May 2011 (BST)
I followed procedure completely. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 19:43, 4 May 2011 (BST)
Personal Information

If a user wants personal information about themselves deleted from the wiki, they should be able to get it speedy deleted.

UDWiki:Administration/Deletion Schedule

strange, I'd already seen that page, so I guess there might be other links floating about the wiki (that or I saw it via the UDwiki facebook page). May be best to keep an eye out.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 20:22, 4 May 2011 (BST)
There's a UDWiki Facebook page? Oh, my! Link plz? ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 20:36, 4 May 2011 (BST)
LOL I didn't mean UDwiki. I meant the UD characters one. Although I'm totally making a UDwiki facebook group now. ;) --Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 21:02, 4 May 2011 (BST)

Template:UDWikiTV/Newsroom

Crit 10. ~Vsig.png Amurica. Fuck. Yeah 06:49, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Isn't meant to be a template, and has content. Should probably rather be moved to the template talk page? -- Spiderzed 12:38, 2 May 2011 (BST)
UDWikiTV is just a redirect to the template but I think perhaps just moving to UDWikiTV/Newsroom would be nicer. I like that news! Has potential, sad it's died though. -- ϑanceϑanceevolution 12:55, 2 May 2011 (BST)

Moved to UDWikiTV/Newsroom. ~Vsig.png Amurica. Fuck. Yeah 16:53, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

User:The General/sig/norm

Unused. Was created while I was fiddling with my sig.--The General T Sys U! P! F! 16:43, 2 May 2011 (BST)

Done.--Yonnua Koponen T G P ^^^ 16:45, 2 May 2011 (BST)

Template:Zl

Crit 10. ~Vsig.png Amurica. Fuck. Yeah 06:49, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Done. -- Spiderzed 12:38, 2 May 2011 (BST)

Template:UDWikiTV/PictureDesk

Crit 1 and crit 10. ~Vsig.png Amurica. Fuck. Yeah 06:49, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Done. -- Spiderzed 12:38, 2 May 2011 (BST)

Template:PREVIOUSMONTHNAME

Crit 1 and crit 7. ~Vsig.png Amurica. Fuck. Yeah 06:49, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Done. -- Spiderzed 12:38, 2 May 2011 (BST)

Template:NEXTMONTHNAME

Crit 1 and crit 7. ~Vsig.png Amurica. Fuck. Yeah 06:49, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Done. -- Spiderzed 12:38, 2 May 2011 (BST)

Template:CalendarColSpan

Crit 1 and crit 7. ~Vsig.png Amurica. Fuck. Yeah 06:49, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Done. -- Spiderzed 12:38, 2 May 2011 (BST)

Template:DI:MD-owb

Old Dezonous template. Unused. Crit 10.~Vsig.png Amurica. Fuck. Yeah 06:49, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Done. -- Spiderzed 12:38, 2 May 2011 (BST)

Template:DI:MDbdg

Another unused Dezonous template. Crit 10. ~Vsig.png Amurica. Fuck. Yeah 06:49, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Done. -- Spiderzed 12:38, 2 May 2011 (BST)

User:SA

Crit 8 - The user made it clear that they wanted the page deleted -- boxy 00:07, 1 May 2011 (BST)

Done. -- Spiderzed 00:10, 1 May 2011 (BST)
Technically not Crit 8 – wasn't requested by the original author – but it's fine by me. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 03:58, 1 May 2011 (BST)